JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for WOMEN-IN-ECOLOGY Archives


WOMEN-IN-ECOLOGY Archives

WOMEN-IN-ECOLOGY Archives


WOMEN-IN-ECOLOGY@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

WOMEN-IN-ECOLOGY Home

WOMEN-IN-ECOLOGY Home

WOMEN-IN-ECOLOGY  July 2021

WOMEN-IN-ECOLOGY July 2021

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

CfP in JAC: The Social Reproduction of Agrarian Change - Feminist Political Economy & Rural Transformations in the Global South

From:

Elena Baglioni <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Elena Baglioni <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 26 Jul 2021 10:17:07 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (47 lines)

Call for Papers For a Special Issue of the Journal of Agrarian Change on 
The Social Reproduction of Agrarian Change: Feminist Political Economy & Rural Transformations in the Global South

Edited by Elena Baglioni, Hannah Bargawi, Alessandra Mezzadri, Lyn Ossome and Sara Stevano

https://www.aqs.org.uk/cfp-for-special-issue-the-social-reproduction-of-agrarian-change-feminist-political-economy-rural-transformations-in-the-global-south/

The Covid-19 pandemic and its socio-economic consequences have exposed the centrality of social reproduction for the functioning of global capitalism (Mezzadri 2020, Stevano et al, 2021). A set of new and thought-provoking theorisations and scholarly interventions have highlighted the ways in which neoliberalism has restructured the institutions and architecture of care, leading to a crisis of reproduction (Fraser, 2017; Bakker and Gill, 2019), and how social oppression is co-constitutive of, rather than epiphenomenal to, the process of class formation (Federici, 2004; Bannerji, 2005; Bhattacharya, 2017). Notwithstanding their differences in approach and objectives (Winders and Smith, 2019), these theorisations have re-energised earlier feminist debates on the role of the household and the features of gendered and racial oppression under capitalism (e.g. Davis, 1981; Mies, 1982). They are reframing and extending debates on exploitation and value (Mezzadri, 2019; Ferguson, 2019; Cammack, 2020), on processes of racialization (Bhattacharyya, 2018; Glenn, 2010)and on the linkages between social oppression and ecological appropriation (e.g. Moore, 2015), also in a context where social movements against patriarchy, colonialism, racism and environmental destruction have become widespread (e.g. Gago, 2018).

If the lens of social reproduction provides new exciting avenues to reclaim a more inclusive history of capitalism, it also offers an opportunity to review key debates in agrarian change and political economy of development. In particular, whilst a growing set of studies have started grappling with ‘decolonising’ and decentring social reproduction approaches by focusing on the Global South, informal work, or agrarian systems (e.g. Naidu and Ossome, 2016; Mezzadri, 2017, 2020; Fernandez, 2018; Cousins et al., 2018; Stevano, 2019; Hornby and Cousins, 2019; Baglioni, 2021), and others have highlighted the embeddedness of agrarian labour regimes in ‘reproduction zones’ (e.g. Pattenden, 2018), more work is needed to systematically place these approaches in conversation with studies analysing the development of capitalism within agrarian settings of the Global South.

In an attempt to contribute to this agenda, this Special Issue deploys a social reproduction lens to engage with theories, debates and empirical studies in the political economy of agrarian change. The political economy of agrarian change has incorporated gendered perspectives, and considered the differential impact of rural transformations on men and women for decades (e.g. Whitehead, 1981; Mackintosh, 1989; Carney and Watts, 1991; Agarwal, 2003; Razavi, 2003; Rao, 2006; Jacobs, 2014; Tsikata, 2016). Building upon these critical insights, the deployment of a social reproduction lens offers a complex theoretical and methodological toolkit that illuminates the ways in which different forms of inequality such as race, ethnicity, caste, class and gender articulate to shape agrarian outcomes. It places at its centre the inter-linkages and dynamics between processes of capitalist production and those involved in the regeneration of life (Katz, 2001; Winders and Smith, 2019). The latter include the reproduction of labour and the environment as they work for, and struggle against, capital. A social reproduction lens emphasises the inherent conflict between forces of production and ‘forces of reproduction’ (Barca, 2020) as labour in its racialised, gendered forms struggles to build autonomies from capital. In agrarian settings, this perspective may help overcome productivist biases and lead to a more systemic incorporation of feminist perspectives and methods in the study of agrarian change.

At the same time, building on a rich tradition of analyses of capitalist transitions, class differentiation, livelihood and subsistence dynamics within the global South, the political economy of agrarian change has the potential to further highlight global relations of social re/production and enrich the social reproduction gaze beyond its urban and industrial horizon. Critical agrarian political economy traditionally emphasises processes and projects of class making and rural differentiation in the countryside when these are often lost and blurred within essentialist notions of the peasantry, family farming or livelihoods (Bernstein and Byres 2001; O’Laughlin, 2002). It is rooted in a rich tradition of painstaking deconstruction of social relations of production in capitalism and the manifold ways they manifest in agrarian settings inhabited by ‘classes of capital’ and ‘classes of labour’ (Bernstein, 2010; Banaji, 2010; Harriss-White, 2014). Indeed, in pursuing this tradition and agenda, the special issue builds on the many contributions of scholars of agrarian change who have, directly and indirectly, spoken significantly about the centrality of reproduction to understanding accumulation and/or class formation (e.g. Benholdt-Thomsen, 1982; Sharma, 1985; Sender and Smith, 1990; Chari, 2004;      Moyo and Yeros, 2005; Moyo et al., 2013; Shivji, 2017; Cousins et al, 2018); access to land and processes of proletarianization in the Global South (Ossome and Naidu, 2021 forthcoming); the industrialisation myth and new agrarian questions (e.g. Moyo et al 2013); trans-local processes including labour circulation and the outcomes of rural industrialisation (e.g. Hart, 2002; Lerche and Shah 2020); and the relation between production, reproduction and health outcomes (e.g. O’Laughlin, 2013). Moreover, it also builds on the excellent work of agrarian political economists on the role and centrality of the household and care provisioning in processes of agrarian transformation (e.g. Razavi, 2009).

The special issue aims at analysing the spaces, temporalities and practices of social reproduction in agrarian contexts of the Global South, drawing broad reflections on how a social reproduction lens contributes to framing, understanding and analysis of contemporary agrarian questions. The issue calls for contributions able to:

Illustrate the tight inter-linkages between productive and reproductive activities and realms in rural settings and/or in processes of rural-urban mobility and labour circulation. This might include analyses and reflections of the new challenges workers in the Global South may face, including in the light of the COVID-19 pandemic (e.g.  Agarwal, 2021; Stevano et al, 2021).
Revisit the history, representation and evolution of the household within processes of agrarian change. This may include examining the household as a site of overlapping productive and reproductive activities as well as a key space that shapes (and/or may oppose or resist) processes of class formation.
Investigate processes of gendered and racialised class formation within the peasantry and ‘peasant way of life’, their hidden insertions within processes of capital accumulation and its different struggles for reproduction.
Explore novel forms of commodification, including how legal and regulatory aspects of the agro-food systems shape processes of racialised and gendered production and reproduction across the global economy.
Scrutinise the centrality of land (including access, ownership and inheritance) to contemporary dynamics of social reproduction in the Global South, in both rural and urban settings (e.g. Ossome and Naidu, 2021).
Examine the links between food, nutrition and health vulnerability through a  social reproduction lens, considering not only the gendered relations that underpin food, nutrition and health outcomes, but also how these intersect with multiple inequalities embedded in reproduction and production processes.       Analyse processes of environmental degradation and its implications in terms of social reproduction, the diversified effects of these ecological and social costs on classes of labour, and the struggles against the effects of climate change, resource extractivism and privatisation and/or environmental degradation.
On the basis of new research, grounded in particular cases, periods and places develop and build on existing debates on the agrarian questions, reflecting how social reproduction perspectives could extend and change our understanding of these debates.

Given the Special Issue’s objective to decenter and decolonise debates on social reproduction and unveil its linkages with debates on agrarian change, the editors welcome a variety of contributions, ranging from original articles to shorter commentaries and position papers based on original research, in order to collect multiple voices and analytical perspectives on the relevance of social reproduction in the context of the political economy of agrarian change. We particularly welcome contributions from scholars from the Global South.

Those interested should submit a 200-word abstract for consideration to Dr Elena Baglioni (corresponding editor) at [log in to unmask] The deadline for the submission of abstracts is 30th September 2021.

Decisions on inclusion in the Special Issue will be communicated by 31st October 2021, and the authors selected will be asked to submit full papers by 30th June 2022. Papers will be finalised based on editors’ initial reviews, and the Special Issue will be submitted in full to the Journal of Agrarian Change by 15th December 2022.


Dr Elena Baglioni
Senior Lecturer in Global Supply Chain Management
Director of the Centre on Labour and Global Production (CLGP) 
https://www.qmul.ac.uk/busman/research/research-centres/clgp/
School of Business and Management, Queen Mary University of London
Room 3.44E, Bancroft Building, Mile End Campus
Email: [log in to unmask]

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the WOMEN-IN-ECOLOGY list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=WOMEN-IN-ECOLOGY&A=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/WOMEN-IN-ECOLOGY, a mailing list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
March 2024
February 2024
November 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
December 2021
November 2021
September 2021
July 2021
June 2021
April 2021
February 2021
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
October 2019
September 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
November 2018
October 2018
July 2018
May 2018
April 2018
February 2018
January 2018
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
July 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
July 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
March 2013
February 2013
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
March 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
June 2010
May 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
April 2009
February 2009
January 2009
September 2008
August 2008
May 2008
April 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
July 2007
March 2007
January 2007
October 2006
September 2006
June 2005
May 2005
August 2004
February 2004
January 2004
November 2003
September 2003
January 2003
October 2002
April 2002
December 2001
November 2001
April 2001
January 2001
December 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
June 2000
May 2000
March 2000
December 1999
November 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager