JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for SPM Archives


SPM Archives

SPM Archives


SPM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SPM Home

SPM Home

SPM  June 2021

SPM June 2021

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: "hijacking" SPM GLM for 1D time-series

From:

Guillaume Flandin <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Guillaume Flandin <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 4 Jun 2021 13:11:47 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (86 lines)

Dear Thierry,

A blast from the past ;-)

The dimensionality here refers to the dimensions of the search space,
such that 1D for fMRI data would mean searching for an effect in space
through a line across the brain. This is what we use for example when
analysing ERP/ERF data from EEG/MEG where we search for an effect across
1-dimensional time from a single sensor (or averaged sensors). To use
this in SPM, you need to create 2D NIfTI images where the first
dimension is time (or space or whatever) and the second dimension is 1
(twisting the NIfTI specs a bit), see e.g.:

https://github.com/spm/spm12/blob/master/spm_eeg_convert2images.m#L190-L193
I presume this is what SPM1D does. There used to be a standalone
spm_1d.m function floating around but can't find it now (RFT in 1D is
fairly simple to implement).

That said, it doesn't seem to be what you are looking for as you are not
searching for an effect through time. If you have a single
neurophysiological time series and multiple behavioural predictors, you
can just use a GLM where the latter will form the design matrix:
  https://github.com/spm/spm12/blob/master/spm_ancova.m
With multiple neurophysiological time series, you could use a
multivariate analysis such as CVA:
  https://github.com/spm/spm12/blob/master/spm_cva.m
Or (and perhaps understanding better only now your setting) just fit a
GLM for each neurophysiological time series in a mass univariate sense;
you could use SPM for this by saving your data in multiple voxels with
arbitrary neighbourhood - just don't smooth in 'space' and use
Bonferroni instead of RFT.
As you mention, temporal non-sphericity has to be taken into account.
This would be an input in spm_ancova or SPM could estimate it with the
last approach, provided you have enough 'voxels'. If your inference is
at the group level, it might still not be an issue as the beta estimates
are unbiased.

Sorry for the convoluted answer and if I entirely misunderstood your
problem.

Best regards,
Guillaume.


On 03/06/2021 17:25, Thierry Chaminade wrote:
> Dear SPM users and experts,
> 
> As a long-time user of SPM (I started with SPM96 and PET data), I've
> been told several times that the SPM statistical machinery could be used
> for all types of data... including 1D time-series. I'm currently trying
> to "hijack" SPM for such use, but fail miserably. I am turning to you
> for some insights and help.
> 
> Simply, I have multiple1D time series (connectivity between areas) and a
> series of predictors (behavioral descriptors), with subjects and
> repetitions. I would like to know how significantly these
> behavioral predictors can "explain" the neurophysiological time-series.
> This is what SPM does for whole-brain analysis of fMRI (4D) time-series.
> But how can I use the same machinery (integrating time autocorrelations,
> not spatial dependencies) when the data is 1D (single value per time-point)?
> 
> I thought a package named SPM1D
> <https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fspm1d.org%2F&data=04%7C01%7C%7C3cf705cc533a4f96edcf08d926ac3d84%7C1faf88fea9984c5b93c9210a11d9a5c2%7C0%7C0%7C637583343894585931%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=AbQj2MmgurTvtel%2Fmho5LjDduLHyc%2F9iZ%2Bx%2FEDl64vQ%3D&reserved=0> could
> do the trick, but it seems it is giving correlations through time, which
> is not what I am looking for. For example, given the connectivity
> between the IFG and the MPFC through time, I want to know how many
> behavioral time-series can explain the neurophysiological one ("betas").
> 
> I started this project thinking it would be trivial, well, it is not.
> And as I don't have the (statistical, mathematical, programming,
> knowledge...) skills of the SPM community, I am asking you whether 1)
> this makes sense, 2) it is already documented somewhere, and 3) it can
> be implemented ?
> 
> Thanks for any feedback that could be helping us!
> 
> Best wishes, Thierry Chaminade.
> 
> 

-- 
Guillaume Flandin, PhD
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging
UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology
London WC1N 3BG

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager