Hi,
It is the resolution where the unmasked FSC first drops below 0.8.
> Does it depends on the mask used?
No, because it uses the unmasked FSC.
> Does numerically small value (higher resolution) cutoff of phase randomisation give higher final resolution of map
> in FSC?
No, it does not matter as long as the cutoff is far from the final resolution.
Best regards,
Takanori Nakane
On 2021/05/19 19:55, Cryo EM wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How does the value of phase randomisation cutoff that gets displayed during RELION post processing job gets decided?
> Does it depends on the mask used? Does numerically small value (higher resolution) cutoff of phase randomisation give higher final resolution of map
> in FSC?
>
> Any input will be helpful.
>
> Thanks!
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the CCPEM list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCPEM&A=1 <https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCPEM&A=1>
>
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the CCPEM list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCPEM&A=1
This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCPEM, a mailing list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/
|