Dear Mark, Marjan and Soroor,
There are also some tools in Cyrils' toolbox:
https://github.com/CPernet/spmup#qa
Both are inspired by the QAP package:
http://preprocessed-connectomes-project.org/quality-assessment-protocol/
I am also intermittently working on adding native QA/QC in SPM; please
let me know if you have specific requests in mind or suggestions for
things that would be great to have for such a tool.
Best regards,
Guillaume.
On 05/04/2021 19:06, Britton,Mark wrote:
> Dear Soroor,
>
> mriQC outputs a number of automated quality control metrics that can be
> used for resting state, task-based, or structural data. You may find
> some of these metrics helpful.
>
> https://mriqc.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
> <https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmriqc.readthedocs.io%2Fen%2Fstable%2F&data=04%7C01%7C%7C5ea57a15657d48f0fe8408d8f85e5315%7C1faf88fea9984c5b93c9210a11d9a5c2%7C0%7C0%7C637532431301954888%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=IziXpVZ51vY9AugYmCouj5r9r4V6ymCd%2BIz%2Fq2ebbo8%3D&reserved=0>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Mark
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* SPM (Statistical Parametric Mapping) <[log in to unmask]> on
> behalf of marjan biria <[log in to unmask]>
> *Sent:* Monday, April 5, 2021 7:52 AM
> *To:* [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
> *Subject:* Re: [SPM] check the quality of data
>
> *[External Email]*
>
>
> Dear Soroor,
>
> I’m no expert myself but since I saw no one else has replied to your
> question so far I thought to reply to you what I plan to do for quality
> check of my own fmri and structural data. It was suggested by someone
> that I could use fmriprep for this purpose. Maybe you could do some
> research to find out whether that also works for resting state data as
> well?
>
> Or maybe someone who is an expert can comment on this?
>
> Good luck!
>
> Best wishes
> Marjan
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 8:22 AM Soroor Shafieizadegan
> <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
> Dear experts,
>
> I work with about 2000 subjects that I have an anatomical image and
> rest-fMRI data for each subject. Due to the large number of data,
> checking the quality of data and the quality of coregisteration and
> normalization related to each subject separately take a lot of time,
> what should I do?
>
> Best,
> Soroor
>
--
Guillaume Flandin, PhD
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging
UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology
London WC1N 3BG
|