Hi
I always recommend to use outbound part of the code (eg BS21) and no more.
Thanks
David
Dr David Reeve
Head of Information, Data and Analytics (and Jisc Data Protection Manager)
4 Portwall Lane, Bristol BS1 6NB
Direct line (Teams): 01174500407
Mobile: 07776858434
Email: [log in to unmask]
jisc.ac.uk
-----Original Message-----
From: The Information and Records Management Society mailing list <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Blyth, Victoria
Sent: 20 January 2021 10:49
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Postcodes
Hi
We have our consultations avoid using the last 2 digits for the reason that identification is possible with postcode and other data, unless we're specifically doing personalised consultation. Even in busy metropolitan areas there are postcodes with only a few properties. This is particularly true if it's full postcode and equalities data.
I generally work on the assumption that full postcode plus anything else is personal data, and work down from there, although we do some solely location-based work where postcodes are not personal data.
Victoria Blyth
Privacy & Data Protection Lead (Deputy DPO) – Records & Information Management London Borough of Barnet, 2 Bristol Avenue, Colindale, NW9 4EW
Tel: 020 8359 2015 | Web: www.barnet.gov.uk
Consider the environment. Do you really need to print this email?
-----Original Message-----
From: The Information and Records Management Society mailing list <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Maxwell Allen
Sent: 20 January 2021 09:54
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Postcodes
Dear friends
How do we feel about FULL postcodes being used for marketing research and segmentation by a third party? I am aware of the FOI Decision Notice (Holy Trinity Church FS50236990 3 August 2009). Also the FOI Decision Notice (Lincolnshire County Council FS50704419 27 March 2018).
To be clear, when we talk about full postcodes, it's the last 2 alpha characters that is a particular concern, as these identity “a street or part of street, a single address, a group of properties, a subsection of a property”.
The key question is whether an individual can be identified by other information if the full postcode is known. In some circumstances it has to be said that certain postcodes may identify a single household. But in any case, if -for example- you were in possession of the exact age of subjects, I would imagine it would be possible to isolate certain households in many circumstances.
Is anyone aware of any other cases or relevant info? Do you agree/disagree with what I've said above?
Max, Civil Service.
To view the list archives go to: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the words UNSUBSCRIBE RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK
For any technical queries re JISC please email [log in to unmask] For any content based queries, please email [log in to unmask]
This email and any attachments to it are intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain sensitive or confidential material and should be handled accordingly. However, it is recognised that, as an intended recipient of this email, you may wish to share it with those who have a legitimate interest in the contents.
If you have received this email in error and you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose, distribute, copy or print any of the information contained or attached within it, all copies must be deleted from your system. Please notify the sender immediately.
Whilst we take reasonable steps to identify software viruses, any attachments to this email may contain viruses which our anti-virus software has failed to identify. No liability can be accepted, and you should therefore carry out your own anti-virus checks before opening any documents.
Please note: Information contained in this e-mail may be subject to public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 or the Environmental Information Regulations 2004.
This message has been scanned by Exchange Online Protection.
To view the list archives go to: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the words UNSUBSCRIBE RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK
For any technical queries re JISC please email [log in to unmask] For any content based queries, please email [log in to unmask]
Jisc is a registered charity (number 1149740) and a company limited by guarantee which is registered in England under company number. 05747339, VAT number GB 197 0632 86. Jisc’s registered office is: 4 Portwall Lane, Bristol, BS1 6NB. T 0203 697 5800.
Jisc Services Limited is a wholly owned Jisc subsidiary and a company limited by guarantee which is registered in England under company number 02881024, VAT number GB 197 0632 86. The registered office is: 4 Portwall Lane, Bristol, BS1 6NB. T 0203 697 5800.
Jisc Commercial Limited is a wholly owned Jisc subsidiary and a company limited by shares which is registered in England under company number 09316933, VAT number GB 197 0632 86. The registered office is: 4 Portwall Lane, Bristol, BS1 6NB. T 0203 697 5800.
For more details on how Jisc handles your data see our privacy notice here: https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice
To view the list archives go to: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the words UNSUBSCRIBE RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK
For any technical queries re JISC please email [log in to unmask]
For any content based queries, please email [log in to unmask]
|