Hello All,
As with many at the moment, we are looking to create a process for the better management of Teams and the content within them.
We have a good overview of how many Teams we have etc and are gathering information on how Teams is currently being used to try and inform a strategic direction for its usage.
I was wondering however, in the process of 'cleaning up' Teams if anyone had any advice on what sort of criteria they use for identifying redundant or stagnant Teams?- specifically, how do others approach defining this (in terms of what kind of length of time since the Teams last activity could class it as 'redundant' or stagnant',' number of active users in the Team, maybe ascertaining things like the purpose of the Team (which is at the moment as you can imagine, very difficult to ascertain as Teams were set up with no defined sort of naming convention- we are working to change this).
Would be keen to know of anyone else's approaches in terms of what parameters you use to ascertain whether it is appropriate for a Team to be 'weeded out'. Particularly keen to hear from anyone who is also using the Teams interface and the SharePoint site under it as one of the 'building blocks' for an EDRMS)
Keen to hear approaches/thoughts,
Best,
Molly
To view the list archives go to: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the words UNSUBSCRIBE RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK
For any technical queries re JISC please email [log in to unmask]
For any content based queries, please email [log in to unmask]
|