JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LIS-MEDICAL Archives


LIS-MEDICAL Archives

LIS-MEDICAL Archives


LIS-MEDICAL@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIS-MEDICAL Home

LIS-MEDICAL Home

LIS-MEDICAL  February 2020

LIS-MEDICAL February 2020

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

[bims-librar] 2020-02-16, seventeen selections

From:

Thomas Krichel <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Thomas Krichel <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 16 Feb 2020 05:12:36 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (533 lines)

bims-librar       Biomed News on Biomedical librarianship
─────────────────────────────┐
Issue of 2020‒02‒16          │ 
seventeen papers selected by │
Thomas Krichel (Open Library │
 Society)                    │
 http://e.biomed.news/librar │
                             │
                             │
                             └──────────────────────────────────────────────────
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

 1. Health information seeking behaviour: a concept analysis.
 2. Mixed-methods library evaluation integrating the patron, library, and 
     external perspectives: The case of Namibia regional libraries.
 3. TeSS: a platform for discovering life science training opportunities.
 4. Information Management in Healthcare and Environment: Towards an 
     Automatic System for Fake News Detection.
 5. Social media is a source of health-related misinformation.
 6. Google Medical Update: Why Is the Search Engine Decreasing Visibility 
     of Health and Medical Information Websites?
 7. Search engines, cognitive biases and the man-computer interaction: a 
     theoretical framework for empirical researches about cognitive biases in 
     online search on health-related topics.
 8. An agent-based model about the effects of fake news on a norovirus 
     outbreak.
 9. Evolving Role of Social Media in Health Promotion: Updated 
     Responsibilities for Health Education Specialists.
10. Understanding the preferences of Australian men for accessing health 
     information.
11. Quality of information about oral cancer in Brazilian Portuguese 
     available on Google, Youtube, and Instagram.
12. YouTube as a source of information about orthodontic clear aligners.
13. Health Professionals' Perception Related to Communication 
     Technologies for Access to Information about Crack.
14. The contributor roles for randomized controlled trials and the 
     proposal for a novel CRediT-RCT.
15. A Weekly, Evidence-Based Health Letter for Caregivers (90Second 
     Caregiver): Usability Study.
16. Qualitative evaluation of paediatric surgical otolaryngology content 
     on YouTube.
17. Evaluating the perceptions of the transgender and non-binary 
     communities of pelvic radiotherapy side effect information booklets.

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

                                                Health Info Libr J. 2020 Feb 12.
 1. Health information seeking behaviour: a concept analysis.
   Zimmerman MS, Shaw G
  BACKGROUND: In 2007, Lambert and Loiselle conducted an extensive concept 
  analysis of the term health information seeking behaviour (HISB) to examine 
  the concept's level of maturity and critically analyse its characteristics. 
  Since their groundbreaking work, HISB has evolved with the proliferation of 
  ICTs. The Internet is now a common and often preferred medium for the 
  pursuit of health information.
   OBJECTIVES: The previous analysis spanned 42 years of literature; this 
  article describes an analysis of the last 10 years of literature on HISB and 
  how online seeking has caused the concept to evolve in the literature.
   METHODS: This study used the concept analysis methodology employed by 
  Lambert and Loiselle in the original analysis. It also included a systematic 
  search conducted in five databases to identify studies from 2007 to 2017, 
  using similar inclusion criteria from the original study.
   RESULTS: Of the more than 500 articles retrieved, 85 journal articles met 
  the inclusion criteria. Consistent with the original work, articles that 
  included outcomes were identified as either behavioural or cognitive.
   CONCLUSION: Most of the attention of the works studied focused on 
  individuals and their information source preferences. This HISB analysis can 
  be incorporated with studies to understand how various communities seek 
  information in online versus non-online contexts.
   Keywords: Internet; concept analysis; consumer health information; 
    information and communication technologies (ICTs); information seeking 
    behaviour; review, literature
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12287
  URL: http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32052549

                   Eval Program Plann. 2020 Jan 27. pii: S0149-7189(19)30146-6. 
 2. Mixed-methods library evaluation integrating the patron, library, and 
     external perspectives: The case of Namibia regional libraries.
   Yim M, Fellows M, Coward C
  The article presents a mixed-methods evaluation of regional libraries in 
  Namibia, which incorporates three perspectives: the patron perspective 
  (library users), the library perspective (library staff, management, and 
  related officials), and the external perspective (including evaluators and 
  monitoring data). Seven data collection methods were used: patron surveys, 
  patron panel studies, focus group discussions, key informant and staff 
  interviews, secondary data analysis, media analysis, and observations. The 
  goal of the evaluation was to assess library performance for both formative 
  and summative purposes by addressing evaluation questions on areas such as 
  library services, use, and operations. Building upon the literature review 
  of how mixed-methods approaches can contribute to library evaluation, the 
  aim of this article is to show how a mixed-methods evaluation can be 
  designed to examine multi-faceted library performance and to illustrate how 
  the evaluation design allows information complementarity and can be utilized 
  to present diverse viewpoints of the above three perspectives. The 
  evaluation design, analysis process, and lessons learned from this study may 
  be useful to evaluators engaged in evaluation of public services or programs 
  (including public libraries) that examine multiple aspects of service 
  performance and involve a variety of stakeholders.
   Keywords: Mixed-methods approach; Performance evaluation; Public library
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101782
  URL: http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32035405

                Bioinformatics. 2020 Feb 11. pii: btaa047. [Epub ahead of print]
 3. TeSS: a platform for discovering life science training opportunities.
   Beard N, Bacall F, Nenadic A, Thurston M, Goble CA, Sansone SA, Attwood TK
  SUMMARY: Dispersed across the Internet is an abundance of disparate, 
  disconnected training information, making it hard for researchers to find 
  training opportunities that are relevant to them. To address this issue, we 
  have developed a new platform - TeSS - which aggregates geographically 
  distributed information and presents it in a central, feature-rich portal. 
  Data are gathered automatically from content providers via bespoke scripts. 
  These resources are cross-linked with related data- and tools registries, 
  and made available via a search interface, a data API and through widgets.
   AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://tess.elixir-europe.org.
   SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at 
  Bioinformatics online.
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa047
  URL: http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32044952

                       Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 02 08. pii: E1066. 
 4. Information Management in Healthcare and Environment: Towards an 
     Automatic System for Fake News Detection.
   Lara-Navarra P, Falciani H, Sánchez-Pérez EA, Ferrer-Sapena A
  Comments and information appearing on the internet and on different social 
  media sway opinion concerning potential remedies for diagnosing and curing 
  diseases. In many cases, this has an impact on citizens' health and affects 
  medical professionals, who find themselves having to defend their diagnoses 
  as well as the treatments they propose against ill-informed patients. The 
  propagation of these opinions follows the same pattern as the dissemination 
  of fake news about other important topics, such as the environment, via 
  social media networks, which we use as a testing ground for checking our 
  procedure. In this article, we present an algorithm to analyse the behaviour 
  of users of Twitter, the most important social network with respect to this 
  issue, as well as a dynamic knowledge graph construction method based on 
  information gathered from Twitter and other open data sources such as web 
  pages. To show our methodology, we present a concrete example of how the 
  associated graph structure of the tweets related to World Environment Day 
  2019 is used to develop a heuristic analysis of the validity of the 
  information. The proposed analytical scheme is based on the interaction 
  between the computer tool-a database implemented with Neo4j-and the analyst, 
  who must ask the right questions to the tool, allowing to follow the line of 
  any doubtful data. We also show how this method can be used. We also present 
  some methodological guidelines on how our system could allow, in the future, 
  an automation of the procedures for the construction of an autonomous 
  algorithm for the detection of false news on the internet related to health.
   Keywords: environment; fake news; graph; healthcare; reinforcement learning
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17031066
  URL: http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32046238

    Evid Based Nurs. 2020 Feb 11. pii: ebnurs-2019-103222. [Epub ahead of print]
 5. Social media is a source of health-related misinformation.
   Rolls K, Massey D
   Keywords: nursing; primary care; world wide web technology
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103222
  URL: http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32046968

                      Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 12. pii: E1160. 
 6. Google Medical Update: Why Is the Search Engine Decreasing Visibility 
     of Health and Medical Information Websites?
   Strzelecki A
  The Google search engine answers many health and medical information queries 
  every day. People have become used to searching for this type of 
  information. This paper presents a study which examined the visibility of 
  health and medical information websites. The purpose of this study was to 
  find out why Google is decreasing the visibility of such websites and how to 
  measure this decrease. Since August 2018, Google has been more rigorously 
  rating these websites, since they can potentially impact people's health. 
  The method of the study was to collect data about the visibility of health 
  and medical information websites in sequential time snapshots. Visibility 
  consists of combined data of unique keywords, positions, and URL results. 
  The sample under study was made up of 21 websites selected from 10 European 
  countries. The findings reveal that in sequential time snapshots, search 
  visibility decreased. The decrease was not dependent on the country or the 
  language. The main reason why Google is decreasing the visibility of such 
  websites is that they do not meet high ranking criteria.
   Keywords: Google; health information websites; medical update; search 
    engine; search visibility
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041160
  URL: http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32059576

                                            Med Health Care Philos. 2020 Feb 13.
 7. Search engines, cognitive biases and the man-computer interaction: a 
     theoretical framework for empirical researches about cognitive biases in 
     online search on health-related topics.
   Russo L, Russo S
  The widespread use of online search engines to answer the general public's 
  needs for information has raised concerns about possible biases and the 
  emerging of a 'filter bubble' in which users are isolated from 
  attitude-discordant messages. Research is split between approaches that 
  largely focus on the intrinsic limitations of search engines and approaches 
  that investigate user search behavior. This work evaluates the findings and 
  limitations of both approaches and advances a theoretical framework for 
  empirical investigations of cognitive biases in online search activities 
  about health-related topics. We aim to investigate the interaction between 
  the user and the search engine as a whole. Online search activity about 
  health-related topics is considered as a hypothesis-testing process. Two 
  questions emerge: whether the retrieved information provided by the search 
  engines are fit to fulfill their role as evidence, and whether the use of 
  this information by users is cognitively and epistemologically valid and 
  unbiased.
   Keywords: Cognitive biases; Hypothesis testing; Information retrieval; 
    Man–machine interaction; Web search engine
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-020-09940-9
  URL: http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32056071

         Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2020 Feb 06. pii: S0398-7620(20)30147-4. 
 8. An agent-based model about the effects of fake news on a norovirus 
     outbreak.
   Brainard J, Hunter PR, Hall IR
  BACKGROUND: Concern about health misinformation is longstanding, especially 
  on the Internet.
   METHODS: Using agent-based models, we considered the effects of such 
  misinformation on a norovirus outbreak, and some methods for countering the 
  possible impacts of "good" and "bad" health advice. The work explicitly 
  models spread of physical disease and information (both online and offline) 
  as two separate but interacting processes. The models have multiple 
  stochastic elements; repeat model runs were made to identify parameter 
  values that most consistently produced the desired target baseline scenario. 
  Next, parameters were found that most consistently led to a scenario when 
  outbreak severity was clearly made worse by circulating poor quality disease 
  prevention advice. Strategies to counter "fake" health news were tested.
   RESULTS: Reducing bad advice to 30% of total information or making at least 
  30% of people fully resistant to believing in and sharing bad health advice 
  were effective thresholds to counteract the negative impacts of bad advice 
  during a norovirus outbreak.
   CONCLUSION: How feasible it is to achieve these targets within communication 
  networks (online and offline) should be explored.
   Keywords: Agent-based-models; Bulles de filtres; Désinformation; Fake 
    news; Filter bubbles; Modèles à base d’agents; Norovirus; Outbreak; 
    Épidémie
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respe.2019.12.001
  URL: http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32037129

                      Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 12. pii: E1153. 
 9. Evolving Role of Social Media in Health Promotion: Updated 
     Responsibilities for Health Education Specialists.
   Stellefson M, Paige SR, Chaney BH, Chaney JD
  The use of social media in public health education has been increasing due 
  to its ability to remove physical barriers that traditionally impede access 
  to healthcare support and resources. As health promotion becomes more deeply 
  rooted in Internet-based programming, health education specialists are 
  tasked with becoming more competent in computer-mediated contexts that 
  optimize both online and offline consumer health experiences. Generating a 
  better understanding of the benefits and drawbacks to using social media in 
  the field is important, since health education specialists continue to weigh 
  its advantages against potential concerns and barriers to use. Accordingly, 
  this Special Issue aims to explore social media as a translational health 
  promotion tool by bridging principles of health education and health 
  communication that examine (1) the method with which social media users 
  access, negotiate, and create health information that is both actionable and 
  impactful for diverse audiences; (2) strategies for overcoming challenges to 
  using social media in health promotion; and (3) best practices for 
  designing, implementing, and evaluating social media forums in public 
  health. In this commentary, we discuss the updated communication and 
  advocacy roles and responsibilities of health education specialists in the 
  context of social media research and practice.
   Keywords: health education; health promotion; social media
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041153
  URL: http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32059561

                                                Aust J Prim Health. 2020 Feb 13.
10. Understanding the preferences of Australian men for accessing health 
     information.
   Hodyl NA, Hogg K, Renton D, von Saldern S, McLachlan R
  With men currently reporting an increased desire to manage their own health, 
  this mixed-methods study aimed to identify the preferred communication 
  channels to support their access to information. Adult cisgender men (n=410) 
  completed an anonymous survey that assessed current methods, preferences and 
  barriers to accessing health information for general, minor, serious and 
  private health concerns. Seven focus groups, attended by 69 men, further 
  explored health-seeking behaviour. Survey results demonstrated the top 
  methods to access information were through the GP or specialist and online 
  searches, with rates differing by age and the type of health concern. Most 
  men (>85%) reported information-seeking for serious concerns, while ~30% did 
  not seek information for minor or private issues. For all ages, the top 
  preferred methods for accessing information included GP or specialists, 
  online searches and pharmacists, with other preferences varying by age, 
  severity and sensitivity. Analysis of the focus group discussions revealed 
  five key themes that help explain men's decisions and actions about seeking 
  health-information: (i) denial; (ii) delayed information seeking; (iii) 
  social constructs of masculinity; (iv) difficulty initiating discussions 
  about health; and (v) perceived trust and validity of information. This 
  study has provided insight into how information can be tailored to 
  communicate effectively with men of different ages. This will support 
  appropriate health-seeking behaviours in response to minor, serious and 
  private health concerns.
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/PY19142
  URL: http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32050082

   Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2020 Feb 10. pii: 23374. [Epub ahead of print]
11. Quality of information about oral cancer in Brazilian Portuguese 
     available on Google, Youtube, and Instagram.
   Passos KK, Leonel AC, Bonan PR, Castro JF, Pontual ML, Ramos-Perez FM, 
   Perez DE
  BACKGROUND: To evaluate the quality of oral cancer information in Brazilian 
  Portuguese on Google, YouTube, and Instagram.
   MATERIAL AND METHODS: The first 100 links of each platform characterized the 
  initial sample. The websites and Instagram were evaluated using the JAMA 
  benchmarks, the Discern instrument, and the Flesch readability index (Flesch 
  Reading Ease). The existence of Health on the Net (HON) code was also 
  registered on websites. The usefulness of each video on YouTube was 
  classified as not useful, slightly useful, moderately useful, or very useful.
   RESULTS: Thirty-four websites, 39 Instagram posts, and 57 videos were 
  evaluated, of which 18 (33.3%) websites and 19 (48.7%) Instagram posts 
  covered only 2 of the 4 JAMA benchmarks. For the Discern instrument, 20 
  (37%) and 18 (33.3%) websites exhibited low and moderate reliability, 
  respectively, while 26 (66.7%) Instagram posts were of low confidence. The 
  level of intelligibility of both websites and Instagram was difficult. Only 
  three websites exhibited the HONcode. Forty-one (71.9%) videos on YouTube 
  were moderately useful.
   CONCLUSIONS: Information on oral cancer on the Internet in Brazilian 
  Portuguese is of low quality. Thus, educational and governmental 
  institutions have a responsibility to produce and indicate reliable sources 
  of information for the population.
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23374
  URL: http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32040464

                                                      Angle Orthod. 2020 Feb 11.
12. YouTube as a source of information about orthodontic clear aligners.
   Ustdal G, Guney AU
  OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the content, reliability, and quality of videos 
  about orthodontic clear aligners on YouTube.
   MATERIALS AND METHODS: Researchers used the Google Trends website to 
  determine that the most frequently used search term for orthodontic clear 
  aligners on the Internet was: "Invisalign." A search was then conducted on 
  YouTube using the key word "Invisalign." From the first 140 results, 100 
  videos were selected for analysis. A 13-point content score was used to 
  classify poor-content and rich-content videos, and the global quality scale 
  (GQS) was used to examine quality of the videos. To evaluate reliability of 
  the information, a five-question scale was used. The Mann-Whitney U-test, χ2 
  test, and Pearson correlation coefficients were used for statistical 
  evaluations.
   RESULTS: Of the YouTube videos, 33 were classified as rich content and 67 as 
  poor content. Most videos (73%) were uploaded by laypeople, and most 
  uploaders (71%) were women. The most commonly discussed content was 
  instructions (65%), followed by procedure (57%) and pain (52%). Regarding 
  the GQS, most of the videos were evaluated as moderate quality (51%). 
  Compared with the poor-content video group, the rich-content video group had 
  a significantly higher GQS score (P = .004). There was no significant 
  difference between the poor-content and rich-content groups regarding 
  information reliability (P > .05).
   CONCLUSIONS: Video content on YouTube relating to aligner orthodontics was 
  generally insufficient. The quality of videos was moderate, but the 
  reliability of information was generally poor. Specialists should refer 
  patients to reliable sources of information.
   Keywords: Clear aligners; Invisalign; Social media; YouTube
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/072419-491.1
  URL: http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32045297

                                                      Int J Prev Med. 2020 ;11 1
13. Health Professionals' Perception Related to Communication 
     Technologies for Access to Information about Crack.
   Novais MAP, De Liberal MMC, Nappo SA, Zucchi P
  Background: The aim of this study is to identify the information and 
  communication technologies used by health professionals to assist in 
  training and updating of technical and scientific knowledge about crack, 
  exchange of experiences, and development of programs to prevent consumption 
  and treatment of addicts.
   Methods: The qualitative methodology was used, constructed an intentional 
  sample by criteria and applied research techniques through semi-structured 
  interviews, triangulation of the analysis, and key informants. The study 
  resulted in the presentation of differences between the way key informants 
  and health professionals sought information.
   Results: Internet was the preferred source; however, key informants sought 
  information on sites of scientific journals and reference centers, while 
  health professionals did free searches on the internet to consume 
  information.
   Conclusions: The literature does not reflect a broad scope of the specific 
  area, but relates the problem of access to health information to other 
  characteristics. The sources of information about crack are focused on 
  digital technologies, the internet and its specific tools. It also finds 
  that health professionals are not being capacitate solidly on the subject of 
  study.
   Keywords: Crack cocaine; and communication technology; health 
    professionals; information
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_197_19
  URL: http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32042398

                                             Ann Transl Med. 2019 Dec;7(24): 812
14. The contributor roles for randomized controlled trials and the 
     proposal for a novel CRediT-RCT.
   Zhang Z, Wang SD, Li GS, Kong G, Gu H, Alfonso F
  Background: The past decade has witnessed a rapid increase in the number of 
  contributors per article, which has made explicitly defining the roles of 
  each contributor even more challenging. The Contributor Roles Taxonomy 
  (CRediT) was developed to explicitly define author roles, but there is a 
  lack of empirical data on how CRediT is used in clinical trials. This study 
  aimed to provide empirical data on the use of CRediT in randomized 
  controlled trials (RCTs) and discuss some limitations of CRediT. A new 
  taxonomy (CRediT-RCT) is proposed to explicitly define the author roles in 
  RCTs.
   Methods: The electronic database of PubMed was searched from July 2017 to 
  October 2019 to identify component trials with a randomized controlled 
  design. Publications from the Public Library of Science (PLoS) were included 
  because they embed the CRediT roles within the authors' metadata rather than 
  solely as a separate paragraph of text.
   Results: A total of 446 articles involving 4,185 authors were included in 
  the study. Most authors participated in the study's conceptualization 
  (44.9%) and investigation (48.8%), but only a fraction of the authors 
  participated in software management (7.4%). Many CRediT roles were 
  correlated with each other: the strongest correlation was the one between 
  funding acquisition and conceptualization (correlation metric =0.39), 
  followed by the one between conceptualization and methodology (0.37). The 
  authors who acquired funding (OR: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.54-2.76; P<0.001), did 
  project administration (OR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.17-2.03; P=0.002), performed 
  supervision (OR: 2. 60; 95% CI: 1.93-3.52; P<0.001), wrote the original 
  draft (OR: 4.83; 95% CI: 3.54-6.60; P<0.001), or were the first author (OR: 
  7.85; 95% CI: 5.71-10.87; P<0.001), were more likely to be the corresponding 
  author. Also, while the original draft writing was significantly associated 
  with the designation of the first author (OR: 37.49; 95% CI: 25.29-57.57; 
  P<0.001), the first author did not perform review and editing (OR: 0.55; 95% 
  CI: 0.40-0.75; P<0.001), supervision (OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.36-0.67; P<0.001), 
  or resource management (OR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.50-1.00; P=0.053). We further 
  propose a novel Contributor Roles Taxonomy for Randomized Controlled Trials 
  (CRediT-RCT) which includes 10 roles.
   Conclusions: The present study provides empirical data on the use of CRediT 
  for RCTs, and some limitations of the taxonomy are discussed. We further 
  propose a new CRediT-RCT which includes 10 roles.
   Keywords: Contribution; authorship; contributor roles; randomized 
    controlled trial; taxonomy
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2019.12.96
  URL: http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32042828

                                        JMIR Form Res. 2020 Feb 12. 4(2): e14496
15. A Weekly, Evidence-Based Health Letter for Caregivers (90Second 
     Caregiver): Usability Study.
   Milios A, McGrath P, Baillie H
  BACKGROUND: Informal caregivers are family members or close friends who 
  provide unpaid help to individuals with acute or chronic health conditions 
  so that they can manage daily life tasks. The greatest source of health 
  information is the internet for meeting the needs of caregivers. However, 
  information on the internet may not be scientifically valid, it may be 
  written in language that is difficult to read, and is often in very large 
  doses. 90Second Caregiver is a health letter whose aim is to disseminate 
  knowledge to caregivers in a user-friendly, weekly format, in order to 
  improve their wellbeing.
   OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to test a sample of 90Second Caregiver 
  health letters in order to assess their usability and to optimize the design 
  and content of the health letters.
   METHODS: Usability research themes were assessed using semi-structured phone 
  interviews, incorporating the Think Aloud method with retrospective 
  questioning.
   RESULTS: Usability was assessed in the context of five main themes: 
  understandability and learnability, completeness, relevance, and quality and 
  credibility of the health letter content, as well as design and format. 
  Caregivers generally provided positive feedback regarding the usability of 
  the letters. The usability feedback was used to refine 90Second Caregiver in 
  order to improve the design and content of the series. Based on the results 
  of this study, it may be of maximum benefit to target the series towards 
  individuals who are new to caregiving or part-time caregivers, given that 
  these caregivers of the sample found the letters more useful and relevant 
  and had the most positive usability experiences.
   CONCLUSIONS: The findings assisted in the improvement of the 90Second 
  Caregiver template, which will be used to create future health letters and 
  refine the letters that have already been created. The findings have 
  implications for who the 90Second Caregiver series should be targeting (ie, 
  newer or part-time caregivers) in order to be maximally impactful in 
  improving mental health and wellbeing-related outcomes for caregivers, such 
  as self-efficacy and caregiving knowledge. The results of this study may be 
  generalizable to the examination of other electronic health information 
  formats, making them valuable to future researchers testing the usability of 
  health information products. In addition, the methods used in this study are 
  useful for usability hypothesis generation. Lastly, our 90Second delivery 
  approach can generate information useful for a set of similar products (eg, 
  weekly health letters targeted towards other conditions/populations).
   Keywords: anxiety; caregivers; depression; health information; hope; 
    mental health; persuasive design; stigma; usability
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/14496
  URL: http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32049064

                                               J Laryngol Otol. 2020 Feb 13. 1-3
16. Qualitative evaluation of paediatric surgical otolaryngology content 
     on YouTube.
   Ward B, Bavier R, Warren C, Yan J, Paskhover B
  OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the quality of YouTube content focusing on 
  common paediatric otolaryngology procedures, as this content can influence 
  the opinions and medical decisions of patients.
   METHODS: A total of 120 YouTube videos were compiled to review using the 
  terms 'adenoid removal', 'adenoidectomy', 'ear tubes', 'tympanostomy', 
  'tonsil removal' and 'tonsillectomy'. The Discern criteria was used to rate 
  the quality of health information presented in each video.
   RESULTS: The mean bias Discern score was 3.18 and the mean overall Discern 
  score was 2.39. Videos including US board certified physicians were rated 
  significantly higher (p < 0.001) than videos without (bias Discern score = 
  3.00 vs 2.38; overall Discern score = 3.79 vs 1.55). The videos had been 
  viewed a total of 176 769 549 times.
   CONCLUSION: Unbiased, high quality videos on YouTube are lacking. As 
  patients may rely on this information when making medical decisions, it is 
  important that practitioners continually evaluate and improve this video 
  content. Otolaryngologists should be prepared to discuss YouTube content 
  with patients.
   Keywords: Adenoids; Social Media; Tonsillectomy; Tympanostomy
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002221512000016X
  URL: http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32051041

                   Radiography (Lond). 2019 Oct 15. pii: S1078-8174(19)30146-4. 
17. Evaluating the perceptions of the transgender and non-binary 
     communities of pelvic radiotherapy side effect information booklets.
   Burton H, Pilkington P, Bridge P
  INTRODUCTION: Patients undergoing radiotherapy for pelvic cancers will often 
  experience acute and late toxicity which can result in symptoms which have a 
  significant impact on psychosocial functioning and quality of life. Having 
  written information regarding these symptoms enables informed 
  decision-making and ongoing support. Transgender and non-binary communities 
  are a marginalised but steadily growing subsection of the radiotherapy 
  patient population yet their needs differ from those of the general 
  population. This study aimed to evaluate the relevance of the pelvic 
  radiotherapy patient information booklets with regard to this communities.
   METHODS: An online survey was distributed via social media to evaluate the 
  perceptions of these communities of four commonly distributed pelvic 
  radiotherapy information booklets.
   RESULTS: There were 19 full responses and most participants expressed 
  discomfort regarding being provided with (11/19) or picking up (10/19) the 
  booklets. Although most (11/19) agreed that the material in the booklets was 
  relevant, the same number felt that the wording was not. Some of the 
  language and assumptions made regarding the transgender and non-binary 
  communities were incorrect and had the potential to cause distress.
   CONCLUSION: The importance of providing guidance and support to these 
  communities was identified.
   IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Further research is required to establish how 
  best to provide inclusive patient information for transgender and non-binary 
  individuals.
   Keywords: Information booklets; Pelvis; Radiotherapy; Transgender
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.09.008
  URL: http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32052785

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the LIS-MEDICAL list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=LIS-MEDICAL&A=1

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager