Looking at rules extensions, they seem very powerful and just what we need. What would be best practice for using them? Would they be used as a "translator" of attributes. e.g. if displayName is a portal defined rule (I think this is called declarative?) built from first+" "+surname, would that be a candidate for a rules extension instead?
Or would it be invoked "on the way out" to AD, for example. Perhaps not, now I type about it.
I get the impression rules extensions are gatekeepers between the connector space and the metaverse. So extend the schema via the portal and use a rules extension to create those new attributes from CS attributes.
thanks,
Alistair
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the MICROSOFT-IDENTITY list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=MICROSOFT-IDENTITY&A=1
|