Hi Alessandra
The point of perfSONAR is to measure WAN network characteristics up to
the maximum available:
https://www.perfsonar.net/about/what-is-perfsonar/
cheers
Duncan
On 09/12/2019 10:19, Alessandra Forti wrote:
> I there a reason for these huge specs? Shouldn't perfsonar measure what
> the actual storage does? This seems to be aimed at measuring only the WAN.
>
> Is this what we are doing now?
>
> cheers
> alessandra
>
> On 06/12/2019 10:07, RAUL H C LOPES wrote:
>> Hi Matt,
>>
>> On 05/12/2019 11:00, Matt Doidge wrote:
>>>
>>> Our vendor came back to us asking why we were specifying AMD over Intel
>>
>> I can understand your vendor. You don't need the best AMD to get a box
>> that delivers very close to 100 Gbps. The vendor might be willing to
>> try best price. Or to dump Intel on you, given that
>>
>> the whole world has gone AMD-mad.
>>
>>
>> Anyway I think that the first spec that Duncan circulated was based on
>> Intel. Based on what we (at Jisc) and ESnet have tested.
>>
>> Raul
>>
>> ########################################################################
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the TB-SUPPORT list, click the following link:
>> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=TB-SUPPORT&A=1
>
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the TB-SUPPORT list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=TB-SUPPORT&A=1
|