Call for Papers: January 2020
Surveillance and Social Justice: Big-data politics, predictions, and potentials
Edited by Dr Leanne McRae (Curtin University), and Associate Professor Mike Kent (Curtin University)
Abstracts Due: 1 January 2020
https://sites.google.com/site/cultware/current-research/surveillance-and-social-justice
Post 9/11 fears of terrorism have radically changed information gathering and intelligence structures. Massive surveillance systems have become a site for daily navigation. Everyday interactions require digitised information for going to the movies, getting insurance, paying bills, and accessing government services. This information is increasingly stored in the cloud in perpetuity with little control over how this information is used and deployed.
An increasing public concern with privacy and security is stimulated by this immense data-gathering milieu. The Cambridge Analytica scandal has focused attention on social media networks, while The Gorgon Stare project has raised concerns about the extent to which safety, risk, crime and harm can be responsibly managed by states as they increasingly outsource policing to private companies.
The motivations behind the gathering of this data is the power that it holds and the potential within it to shape and redefine human knowledge and practises. Data-sets reveal patterns of human behaviour and allow the tracking of outcomes and the prediction of potentialities. Despite Google’s growing reputation as a massive database of our personal search histories and ‘pioneer of surveillance capitalism’ it also is a site for the tremendous social benefit of this data dragnetting. Viktor Mayer- Schӧnberger and Kenneth Cukier recount the role Google played in containing a potential H1N1 outbreak:
Google could “predict” the spread of the winter flu in the United States, not just nationally, but down to specific regions and even states. The company could achieve this by looking at what people were searching for on the Internet. Since Google receives more than three billion search queries every day and saves them all, it had plenty of data to work with.
Google took the 50 million most common search terms that Americans type and compared the list with CDC data on the spread of seasonal flu between 2003 and 2008. The idea was to identify areas infected by the flu virus by what people searched for on the Internet. Others had tried to do this with Internet search terms, but no one else had as much data, processing power, and statistical know-how as Google.
We are seeking chapters that interrogate these awkward and in-between spaces of the surveillance society – between the oppressive and terrifying and the socially just and beneficial. How can the coerced digital participation context service social justice rather than harm it? Instead of continued oppression of disempowered and unpopular individuals and groups, how might big-data surveillance assist resistance and rebellion, social justice and mobility?
Potential Topics:
Social Media and Security
Privacy and Empowerment
Big Data for Health
Governance, Sovereignty and Human Rights
CCTV, Cities and Movement through Urban Spaces
Big Data and the Environment
The GDPR and European Identity
Terms of Service and Data Use Policies
Facial Recognition Masks and other surveillance obscuring fashions
AI and the Right to be Forgotten
Big Brother in the 21st Century
Popular Culture, Big Data and the Representation of Surveillance
Parenting, Technology and Surveillance
Message Encryption and Resistance
Open Source/Open Society?
Corporate Surveillance
Submission Procedure
Potential authors are invited to submit chapter abstracts of no more than 500 words, including a title, 4 to 6 keywords, and a brief bio, by email to [log in to unmask] and [log in to unmask] by 1 January 2020. (Please indicate in your proposal if you wish to use any visual material, and how you have or will gain copyright clearance for visual material). Authors will receive a response by 15 February 2020, with those provisionally accepted due as chapters of approximately 6000 words (including references) by 15 May 2020 for review. If you would like any further information, please contact Mike or Leanne.
About the editors:
Leanne McRae is a Research Officer with Curtin University in Disability Studies currently working on ARC funded research entitled, Navigating Urban Spaces. Her first book; Terror, Leisure and Consumption: Spaces for Harm in a Post-Crash Era was published in 2018 with Emerald. Her second book; Crowd-Sourced Syllabus: A Curriculum for Resistance is currently under contract, also with Emerald, to be published in 2020. A third book contracted for Lexington Books entitled Secrecy, Social Media, and the State: Defining Crime, Managing Harm, and Protecting Privacy will be completed in 2020.
Mike Kent is an Associate Professor in the Centre for Culture and Technology at Curtin University. Mike’s research focus is on online social networking platforms as well as people with disabilities and their use of, and access to, information communication technology and the Internet. His other area of research interest is in higher education and particularly online education. His past successful edited collections include Manifestos for the Future of Critical Disability Studies and Interdisciplinary Approaches to Disability: Looking Towards the Future edited with Katie Ellis, Rosemarie Garland-Thomson and Rachel Robertson (Routledge, 2019), Chinese social media: Social, cultural and political implications with Katie Ellis and Jian Xu (Routledge, 2018), Disability and Social Media: Global perspectives with Katie Ellis, (Routledge, 2017), Massive Open Online Courses and Higher Education: What went right, what went wrong and where to now with Rebecca Bennett (Routledge, 2017), Disability and the Media: Critical Concepts in Cultural and Media Studies (four volumes) with Katie Ellis (Routledge 2017), and An Education in Facebook: Higher Education and the World’s Largest Social Network with Tama Leaver (Routledge 2014). His forthcoming book projects include The Routledge International Handbook of Critical Disability Studies with Katie Ellis, Gaming Disability: Disability perspectives on contemporary video game with Katie Ellis and Tama Leaver, and Disability and Media – African perspectives with Tafadzwa Rugoho
--------------------------------------------------------
MeCCSA mailing list
--------------------------------------------------------
To manage your subscription or unsubscribe from the MECCSA list, please visit:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=MECCSA&A=1
-------------------------------------------------------
MeCCSA is the subject association for the field of media, communication and cultural studies in UK Higher Education.
This mailing list is a free service and is not restricted to members. It is an unmoderated list and content reflect the views of those who post to the list and not of MeCCSA as an organisation.
MeCCSA recommends that the list be used only for posting of information (for example about events, publications, conferences, lectures) of interest to members or to promote discussion of current issues of wide general interest in the field. Posts to the MeCCSA mailing list are public, indexed by Google, and can be accessed from the JISCMail website (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/meccsa.html).
Any messages posted to the list are subject to the JISCMail acceptable use policy, which states that users should avoid engaging in unreasonable behaviour, or disrupting the general flow of discussion on a list.
For further information, please visit: http://www.meccsa.org.uk/
--------------------------------------------------------
|
