Hi Guangyu,
Thanks for the report - we'll look into this and make sure it is fixed
for the next version.
Cheers,
Paul
On 30/07/2019, Guangyu Zhou <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear FSL experts,
>
> I recently updated FSL to the latest version (6.0.1). However, when we run
> img2imgcoord on some old data, we got a different (wrong) result.
>
> Here's the details of one testing dataset that can be found at
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=1LSAbEjWlHhKJVODkiKjyuCrqAbL6vZKk.
> coord_in_ct.txt is the coordinate file (in mm) in the same space to
> CT.nii.gz
> ct2MR_pre_affine.mat is the flirt transformation matrix from CT to MR_pre
> coord_in_MR_pre_correct.txt is the coordinates in MR_pre space that we got
> with an earlier version of FSL. And I think it's correct.
> coord_in_MR_pre_wrong.txt was obtained using FSL v6.0.1 which I think is
> incorrect.
>
> So I am wondering could it be possible that there's some bugs in the command
> img2imgcoord.
>
> Thank you in advance for looking into this.
>
> Let me know please if you need more information.
>
>
> Best Wishes,
> Guangyu
>
> ########################################################################
>
> To unsubscribe from the FSL list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=FSL&A=1
>
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the FSL list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=FSL&A=1
|