Hi all,
Costas and I are travelling that day.
In principle we will be able to make it to the review, but right now we
cannot really promise much more than that.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Cheers,
Marco
Il 2019-07-10 18:05 Gallagher, Hugh R ha scritto:
> July 19 at 8 CT would work for me. Cheers, Hugh
>
> _~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_
> _Hugh Gallagher_
> _Professor and Department Chair_
>
>> On Jul 10, 2019, at 11:42 AM, adi ashkenazi <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I’d be happy to meet next Friday, but available only at 8 am CT.
>> Could this work for you?
>>
>> Looking forward,
>> adi
>>
>> On 10 Jul 2019, at 9:00, Dytman, Steven A <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Hugh,
>> I'm happy to have you organize the reviews.
>>
>> Next 2 weeks are restricted for me. Many of the principals are here
>> for a
>> workshop. I will be away Tues-Thur morn next week. I am free
>> following
>> week when you are away, then away week after that.
>>
>> Ugh, complicated. Next Fri (July 19) might work. What do you
>> think, Adi?
>>
>> regards,
>> Steve
>>
>> On 7/8/2019 10:54 AM, Gallagher, Hugh R wrote:
>> Hi Everyone -
>>
>> I think physics-wise this does fit in the PPWG, and I’m happy to
>> organize the reviews. Steve, you've had more contact with the
>> developer so if you’d like to organize the reviews I’m
>> completely happy with that too, I’ll let you decide.
>>
>> The next two weeks are good for me, I’m currently scheduled for
>> vacation 7/22-7/29.
>>
>> Cheers, Hugh
>>
>> On Jul 5, 2019, at 2:35 PM, Dytman, Steven A <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Costas,
>>
>> thanks for your thoughts.
>>
>> On 7/5/2019 2:25 PM, Constantinos Andreopoulos wrote:
>> Thanks for consulting from the beginning Steve, but this is an
>> opportunity for others to have a say too. From the discussions at
>> Trento I can recall a number of simplifications / approximations
>> that need to be discussed and agreed more broadly before deployment.
>> Also, the changes in structure are significant and, as always, this
>> is not purely a code issue but a physics issue too: every
>> factorisation constraints the kinds of future developments that
>> would fit in and be able to reuse existing code, so we need to get
>> this right. I don't disagree with anything above, never tried to say
>> anything otherwise.
>> Also, we need a set of validations within GENIE, and not external
>> to GENIE, otherwise we won’t be in position to tell if bugs creep
>> in. Adi's checks were using GENIE and external data. Yes, it was
>> before you guys made many changes
>> so validation will be redone. I was only expressing some optimism
>> that significant checks are
>> already done.
>>
>> regards,
>> Steve
>>
>> cheers
>> C
>>
>> --
>>
>> PROFESSOR COSTAS ANDREOPOULOS, _FHEA_
>> _Chair of Experimental Particle Physics_
>> University of Liverpool & STFC / RAL
>> http://costas.andreopoulos.eu [1]
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 5 Jul 2019, at 18:40, Dytman, Steven A <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Marco, Adi,
>> thanks for providing code for this advance. I consulted with Adi on
>> physics
>> from the beginning and Marco has taken lead on code structure
>> issues. I've
>> already seen plots compared to e4nu data where I am a collaborator;
>> they
>> look
>> reasonable.
>>
>> I don't care who calls the meeting. For me, next 2 weeks are a bit
>> busy,
>> would hope for the following week. Perhaps, that's trouble for
>> others?
>>
>> regards,
>> Steve
>>
>> On 7/5/2019 12:17 PM, Marco Roda wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I just had a chat with Adi about the status of the radiation
>> corrections for electron scattering.
>>
>> According to her, the bulk of the work is done, especially from
>> the
>> point of the framework. She is also ready to start testing.
>>
>> I suggest that before extensive testing we should have a code
>> review as
>> the number of changes quite large and touch a number of different
>> places.
>> To facilitate this operation I created a "fake" pull request that
>> should not be accepted but it's there in order to identify the
>> changes.
>> The pull request is here
>>
> https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FGENIE-MC%2FGenerator%2Fpull%2F40&data=02%7C01%7Cdytman%40PITT.EDU%7C2987b8938c90473fd75f08d70164537e%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1%7C1%7C636979402726199119&sdata=w7BwiQp2dQlnSeA4gxysMP3NfYT4oS%2BEh1l093%2FCgIg%3D&reserved=0
>> [2]
>>
>> I invite everybody to start having a look look and send opinions
>> before
>> an actual code review, which I believe we should schedule ASAP.
>> Adi already has a list of tests she will perform that should be
>> discussed in the relevant WG.
>>
>> This was was kind supervised by Steve Dytman. Is that him who
>> should
>> run the review? Or it's Hugh, since we are talking about a primary
>> interaction process?
>> Please, let us know so that we can move ahead.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Marco
>>
>>
> ########################################################################
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the NEUTRINO-MC-CORE list, click the following
>> link:
>>
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=NEUTRINO-MC-CORE&A=1
>> [3]
>
> -------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the NEUTRINO-MC-CORE list, click the following
> link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=NEUTRINO-MC-CORE&A=1
> [3]
>
> -------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the NEUTRINO-MC-CORE list, click the following
> link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=NEUTRINO-MC-CORE&A=1
> [4]
>
> -------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the NEUTRINO-MC-CORE list, click the following
> link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=NEUTRINO-MC-CORE&A=1
>
>
> -------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the NEUTRINO-MC-CORE list, click the following
> link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=NEUTRINO-MC-CORE&A=1
>
>
> -------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the NEUTRINO-MC-CORE list, click the following
> link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=NEUTRINO-MC-CORE&A=1
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1]
> https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcostas.andreopoulos.eu%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cdytman%40PITT.EDU%7Ca6eefc45250f4568c65208d703b42100%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1%7C0%7C636981944501882619&sdata=0EArLyIDv3RGPM7M9vI3Ahm3eb40R%2BjguxaFF00AEm0%3D&reserved=0
> [2]
> https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FGENIE-MC%2FGenerator%2Fpull%2F40&data=02%7C01%7Cdytman%40PITT.EDU%7Ca6eefc45250f4568c65208d703b42100%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1%7C0%7C636981944501882619&sdata=opsnGKsztW8Z%2FktrGY6E9OVD7iB%2F2a7xuAFQtdKyVAo%3D&reserved=0
> [3]
> https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jiscmail.ac.uk%2Fcgi-bin%2Fwebadmin%3FSUBED1%3DNEUTRINO-MC-CORE%26A%3D1&data=02%7C01%7Cdytman%40PITT.EDU%7Ca6eefc45250f4568c65208d703b42100%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1%7C0%7C636981944501892614&sdata=kOYS6jbq6xVDF6UNgb0REaO6wTf4jd1L9QUui0sY9WQ%3D&reserved=0
> [4]
> https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jiscmail.ac.uk%2Fcgi-bin%2Fwebadmin%3FSUBED1%3DNEUTRINO-MC-CORE%26A%3D1&data=02%7C01%7Cdytman%40PITT.EDU%7Ca6eefc45250f4568c65208d703b42100%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1%7C0%7C636981944501902613&sdata=V2RNvmwAimhgIZZ2%2Bb20Kg7WlEmIj1Zf7dxTmamoKTs%3D&reserved=0
--
Marco Roda
PhD in Physics
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the NEUTRINO-MC-CORE list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=NEUTRINO-MC-CORE&A=1
|
