Dear Imad,

we are at the beginning of the drafting phase of the Paper 030 on the 
reconstruction of hadrons in the combined setup (SiW ECAL + AHCAL).

According to our updated procedures

https://agenda.linearcollider.org/event/8023/contributions/42113/attachments/33463/51265/talk300818-v4.pdf
(Page 4)

there should always be a SpB member part of the Editorial Board. The SpB 
Chair acts as a "consultant" who intervenes in case of conflicts or any 
sort of question that the EB is not able to solve with the authors. In 
the case of Paper030 R.P. is member of the EB. In this case it is 
foreseen that the role of the consultant is delegated to the 
Spokesperson or the IB Chair. Since Frank is among the authors I would 
therefore like to ask you Imad to accept the role of the consultant. In 
principle the consultant should not intervene during the drafting phase 
but should be informed at the beginning of the drafting phase and before 
draft circulation in the collaboration (or at any moment that the EB or 
the authors think is appropriate). Only in case of strong arguments this 
consultant should e.g. stop the circulation.

For information:

- Authors: Yasmine Israeli, Frank Simon

- EB: Eva Sicking, Andy White, R.P.

Cheers,

Roman

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CALICE-SPEAKERS-BUREAU list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CALICE-SPEAKERS-BUREAU&A=1