JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for BUGS Archives


BUGS Archives

BUGS Archives


BUGS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BUGS Home

BUGS Home

BUGS  April 2019

BUGS April 2019

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

R2WinBUGS - Trap - NIL dereference (read) and Index out of range

From:

Tristan Curteis <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Tristan Curteis <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 26 Apr 2019 14:35:26 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (29 lines)

Hi all,

I am running a network meta-analysis model using WinBUGS via R, with the R package R2WinBUGS. I get two trap errors just as WinBUGS is about to close and R is about to import the coda files:
•	Index out of range
•	NIL dereference (read)

The model runs fine when just using WinBUGS on its own, i.e. not through R.

For context, I am using 3 chains and updating the model with a full-run which uses the last chain values of a burn-in run. That is, I call bugs() twice, once for burn-in, once for full-run. For the burn-in period, I monitor two vectors of parameters of length < 20. This seems to work fine, for at least up to 300,000 iterations (I will typically use much fewer).

The full-run monitors around 500 parameters (including scalars, vectors and arrays). With R2WinBUGS the simulations for up to around 10,000 iterations are produced without problem. It’s only when I increase the number of iterations to approximately 30,000 or more that I start to get the trap errors. Ideally, I would like to have the opportunity to do more: for example, if future analyses produce chains with high auto-correlation. The trap errors occur just as WinBUGS is about to close. That is, just as history(*,…) appears in the WinBUGS script. WinBUGS also tends to enter a state of ‘not responding’ at the coda(*,…) and stats(*) stage. I assume this is due to the size of the files.

I suspect the errors are caused by memory issues, since it is only when the number of iterations increases that the trap errors appear. At the same time, the coda files are not overwhelmingly large and should be able to be read in by R. Since the model runs fine in WinBUGS (on its own); in R with R2WinBUGS for the burn-in run and for a short number of iterations at the full-run; and the model code is very similar to the NICE technical support document, I do not think the issues lie with the model code. 

Does anybody know what the source of the two trap errors might be? 

Any help would be greatly appreciated – please be in touch if you require any more details. 

Best wishes,
Tristan

-------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is for BUGS users to support each other, ask questions or share ideas.
To mail the BUGS list, mail to [log in to unmask]
Before mailing, please check the archive at www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/bugs.html
Please do not mail attachments to the list.
To leave the BUGS list, send LEAVE BUGS to [log in to unmask]
If this fails, mail [log in to unmask], NOT the whole list

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
January 2024
December 2023
August 2023
March 2023
December 2022
November 2022
August 2022
May 2022
March 2022
February 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager