Hi Carlotta,
I'm guessing that you have missing values in your dependent variables.
You will need to exclude them (and the corresponding p-values) before
calculating the correlation.
But what you're doing doesn't make any sense to me. How are you
determining which DV value corresponds to which p-peak?
Paul
On 25/03/2019, Carlotta Fabris <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi Paul!
>
> I did some glm analyses on a dataset and I obtained activation tables with p
> peaks for each cluster. I have the DVs and I would like to find a
> correlation of these DVs with the peaks.
>
> I tried to do a mean of the DVs and then did a Pearson correlation with
> MATLAB, but I ended up with NaNs. So, I concluded that this approach wasn't
> correct. What do you suggest?
>
> The DVs are like this:
> 3
> 4
> 4
>
> 2
> 3
> 3
> 3
> 0
> 4
> 4
> 3
> 3
> 4
> 3
> 4
> 4
> 4
> 3
> 4
> 4
> 4
> 4
> 3
>
> and I have 240 of these.
>
>
> Thank you.
>
> ########################################################################
>
> To unsubscribe from the FSL list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=FSL&A=1
>
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the FSL list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=FSL&A=1
|