Dear Torben,
On 5 Feb 2019, at 11:14, Torben Lund wrote:
> Dear Christian
>
> Along the same lines. It would be great with a map that stored where
> the topological defects are located.
This defect map is save if you increase verbosity level to 3 in
cat_defaults:
cat.extopts.verb = 3; % verbose output: 1 - default;
2 - details; 3 - write debugging files
Best,
Christian
>
>
> Best
> Torben
>
>
>
>> Den 5. feb. 2019 kl. 09.35 skrev Christian Gaser
>> <[log in to unmask]>:
>>
>> Dear Christian,
>>
>> On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 18:01:13 +0000, Christian N. <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I assume that the "Size of topology defects" number, which appears
>>> in the report sheet after every CAT12 segmentation, indicates the
>>> number of uncorrected errors found during surface reconstruction.
>>
>> The Euler number gives rather a link to the number of defects.
>> However, even for a small number of defects there might be quite
>> large defects that might affect quality of surface reconstruction.
>>
>> If I am right, do you know if there is any "standard" threshold from
>> which I should start excluding subjects? Would it be wise to include
>> only those subjects with 0 topology errors?
>> No, this would be quite painful, because this is rather unlikely. You
>> should check data with many defects (large Euler number) and/or
>> larger defect sizes more carefully, but there is no specific
>> threshold or rule of thumb to reject data.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Christian
>>>
>>> Thanks.
|