Dear Christian
Along the same lines. It would be great with a map that stored where the topological defects are located.
Best
Torben
> Den 5. feb. 2019 kl. 09.35 skrev Christian Gaser <[log in to unmask]>:
>
> Dear Christian,
>
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 18:01:13 +0000, Christian N. <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I assume that the "Size of topology defects" number, which appears in the report sheet after every CAT12 segmentation, indicates the number of uncorrected errors found during surface reconstruction.
>
> The Euler number gives rather a link to the number of defects. However, even for a small number of defects there might be quite large defects that might affect quality of surface reconstruction.
>
> If I am right, do you know if there is any "standard" threshold from which I should start excluding subjects? Would it be wise to include only those subjects with 0 topology errors?
> No, this would be quite painful, because this is rather unlikely. You should check data with many defects (large Euler number) and/or larger defect sizes more carefully, but there is no specific threshold or rule of thumb to reject data.
>
> Best,
>
> Christian
>>
>> Thanks.
|