I haven't explored it much but I think Dimensions
(app.dimensions.ai) are tracking citations too, and their database
includes datasets. They've got a fairly rich API too, which
they're encouraging people to use to calculate metrics of various
kinds.
Jez
Sebastian Karcher writes:
> Hi Nick,
>
> The most promising initiative on this is Scholix
> http://www.scholix.org/, which is supported by DataCite,
> CrossRef and a host of other big players. There’s an initial
> implementation here:
> http://scholexplorer.openaire.eu/index.html#/
> You’ll see that this, too, misses many citations – many data
> citations are “informal” and thus hard to track and even where
> data are “properly” cited, not all publishers pass that
> information on properly. The expectation is that this is going
> to get much better pretty quickly, though.
>
> I haven’t seen the Clarivate data citation indexed
> used/referenced at all (though I’ve been aware of it for several
> years), likely because of the issues Patricia mentions.
>
> Hth,
> Sebastian
>
> From: Research Data Management discussion list
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nick
> Sheppard
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2018 7:08 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Research data and peer review? (7)
>
> Hi all
>
> Thanks again for all the input, I wonder if I can ask another
> question to the list about tracking data citation?
>
> To my knowledge, the only tool out there is the Data Citation
> Index from Clarivate Analytics (to which I don’t have access).
>
> Does anyone have experience of it and could comment on its
> value?
>
> The coverage is perhaps limited I think, especially of
> institutional data repositories – from a quick search of their
> master data repository
> list<http://wokinfo.com/products_tools/multidisciplinary/dci/repositories/search/?utm_source=false&utm_medium=false&utm_campaign=false>
> it is indexing 43 UK based repositories; in terms of general
> ‘institutional repositories’ I can spot 7 (Aston, Bristol,
> Southampton, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Surrey, Bath).
>
> Thanks
>
> Nick
>
>
>
>
> From: Nick Sheppard
> Sent: 14 September 2018 08:49
> To: Research Data Management discussion list
> <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
> Subject: RE: Research data and peer review? (7)
>
>
> Thanks all for the useful comments and info on and off list.
>
>
>
> Danny - We've had a few requests for anonymous peer review but I
> wouldn't call it 'regular'. I'd be interested in hearing more
> about how you intend to approach the issue, presumably any model
> based on Apollo will necessarily reveal the affiliation of an
> author due to the institutional URL?
>
>
>
> We blogged about this last year - Research data: enabling peer
> review<https://leedsunilibrary.wordpress.com/2017/06/23/research-data-enabling-peer-review/>
>
>
>
> Nick
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Research Data Management discussion list
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Danny
> Kingsley
> Sent: 14 September 2018 06:03
> To:
> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Research data and peer review? (7)
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Responding to Henry's comment about the reviewers being
> concerned about their anonymity being compromised if they
> accessed the data, we have the opposite problem with our
> repository.
>
>
>
> We have regular requests from researchers who are depositing
> their data but keeping it under embargo until the paper is
> published. They however who would like reviewers to be able to
> access the data without releasing it publicly, and ideally not
> identifying them. We don’t have the technical capability to do
> this yet, although we are working on it.
>
>
>
> The point being, Nick, that there clearly is a need for these
> people to have their data reviewed or at least available for
> review. I don’t know the disciplines I'm sorry.
>
>
>
> As an aside, we held a session yesterday with our Data Champions
> that was run by PLOS to discuss the implications, practicalities
> and benefits of peer review of data that supports articles under
> review for publication.
>
>
>
> Danny
>
>
>
> Dr Danny Kingsley
>
> Deputy Director - Scholarly Communication & Research Services
> Cambridge University Library
>
> e: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>
> p: 01223 747 437
>
> m: 07711 500 564
>
>
>
>
>
> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 13:38:14 +0000
>
> From: Nick Sheppard
> <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>
> Subject: Research data and peer review?
>
>
>
> Hi all
>
>
>
> I'm just preparing a presentation for the 5:AM Altmetric
> Conference at the end of the month and realised I've made a
> rather sweeping statement in my abstract:
>
>
>
> "As an important component of the scholarly record, research
> data, software and code are increasingly managed as research
> outputs in their own right, though are not typically subject
> to peer review."
>
>
>
> I've encountered one or two instances where I am aware that
> data has been requested for review and wondered if anyone
> has information of specific journals or publishers who do so
> routinely?
>
>
>
> For anyone interested, the full abstract is here:
>
>
>
> Has anyone seen my data? Incentivising #opendata sharing
> with
> altmetrics<https://leedsunilibrary.wordpress.com/2018/08/02/has-anyone-seen-my-data-incentivising-opendata-sharing-with-altmetrics/>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Nick
>
>
>
> Nick Sheppard
>
> Open Research Advisor
>
> Leeds University Library
>
> 0113 343 4542
>
>
>
> https://library.leeds.ac.uk/
>
> https://researchdata.leeds.ac.uk<https://researchdata.leeds.ac.uk/<https://researchdata.leeds.ac.uk%3chttps:/researchdata.leeds.ac.uk/>>
>
>
>
> Twitter: @OpenResLeeds<https://twitter.com/openresleeds>
>
> [Image result for be inspired leeds uni library logo]
>
> Edward Boyle Library, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 15:16:03 +0000
>
> From: "Rzepa, Henry S"
> <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>
> Subject: Re: Research data and peer review?
>
>
>
> We (I am a computational chemist) have been submitting data
> (raw, and also nowadays what might be described as FAIR) to
> journals for around ten years now. In referee comments I
> have received back on around 60 articles, I believe referees
> have only noted twice that they appreciated the availability
> of the data. I do not recollect any comments that they
> actually reviewed it. We do include a statement in the
> supporting letter that it exists (I do remember one referee
> objecting to its presence on the grounds that if they had
> tried to access it, it would compromise their anonymity in
> our server logs!)
>
>
>
> In turn,acting as a referee, I have attempted to replicate
> perhaps 5 articles and have said so in my comments (the
> replications were mostly successful). On one interesting
> occasion (PNAS) I was actually named as a referee in the
> header to the article, but no further information was
> allowed to be provided (such as that the referee
> successfully, or not, replicated various claims).
>
>
>
> One virtue of FAIR data might be supposed that it is
> “referee friendly”. But given the general lack of any
> response to the data by referees, it is difficult to know
> why more do not report back on the virtues of having access
> to it!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ***********************************************************************
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ########################################################################
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from the RESEARCH-DATAMAN list, click the
> following link:
>
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=RESEARCH-DATAMAN&A=1
>
> ________________________________
>
> To unsubscribe from the RESEARCH-DATAMAN list, click the
> following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=RESEARCH-DATAMAN&A=1
>
> ########################################################################
>
> To unsubscribe from the RESEARCH-DATAMAN list, click the
> following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=RESEARCH-DATAMAN&A=1
--
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the RESEARCH-DATAMAN list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=RESEARCH-DATAMAN&A=1
|
