In my opinion, it would have been better to list down the data points
and the ressults of your analyses so that those who want to assist can
do so,
Thanks,
HMisiri PhD
On 7/24/18, paaveen jeyaganth <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear allstat ,
> i have 4 data point i did a pearson correlation end up with
> r= 0.8919
> p= 0.1081
> why is that it's not significant since it's high correlation 0.89
> because of sample size??
>
> Thanks
> Paaveen
>
> You may leave the list at any time by sending the command
>
> SIGNOFF allstat
>
> to [log in to unmask], leaving the subject line blank.
>
--
Humphrey .E. Misiri
PhD(Oslo) MSc(Belgium) BSc(Malawi)
=================================
Motto:"God made foolish the wisdom of this world."
Favourite Quotes:
" I'm not trying to support my ignorance now by trying to say we don't need
education.
That might have its place. But education without salvation has no anchor.
It's all sails and no anchor"- from Perseverance by William Marrion Branham
"Did not Jesus say that the children of this world are wiser than the
children of the Kingdom?"
You may leave the list at any time by sending the command
SIGNOFF allstat
to [log in to unmask], leaving the subject line blank.
|