These people came up with the phrase "optimal cord clamping":
https://www.drgreene.com/ticc-tocc/
At 01:32 AM 7/2/2018, McCourt, Christine wrote:
>Well said perhaps tthis highlights a wider issue of language where practices that according to evidence and many women’s preferences should be the norm are described as though they are alternative. I think this has shifted a bit now with birth positions what used to be called ‘alternative’ iss now more likely called upright, etc. It has occurred to me that really the term for previous practice might now be better put as ‘precipitate cord clamping’?
>
>
>Christine McCourt
>Professor of Maternal Health & Centre Lead
>Centre for Maternal & Child Health Research
><http://www.city.ac.uk/health>School of Health Sciences
>City, University of London
>1 Myddelton Street
>London EC1R 1UW
>
>Tel: 0207 040 5863
>Mob: 0791 235 1476
>Twitter: @ProfMcCourt
>
>Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research | City ...
>The Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research carries out high quality research that aims to improve the health and care of women, children, families and communities.
><https://blogs.city.ac.uk/mchresearch/>Read more...
>
>
>Want to further your clinical and academic career? To find out more about City, University of London’s MSc Advanced Practice Midwifery programme please click <http://www.city.ac.uk/courses/postgraduate/advanced-practice-in-health-and-social-care-midwifery#course-detail=0>here.
>
>
>
>cid:image002.jpg@01D39935.C983C990
>
>
>
>
>
>From: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of "Dr. Christiane Schwarz" <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>, "Dr. Christiane Schwarz" <[log in to unmask]>
>Date: Monday, 2 July 2018 at 06:41
>To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Re: AW: Advice on physiologic birth
>
>Good morning everybody,
>
>I suggest we stop using the term delaayed cord clamping“- to wait until pulsation ceases is not delayed! It should be the reference point for normal.
>
>Best regards
>Christiane Schwarz
>Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>
>
>Am 01.07.2018 um 23:55 schrieb reem hatamleh <<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]>:
>Dear all
>I think there are two points can be added to the definition
>1. no need for episiotomy
>2. no incidence of laceration or tear in the birth canal
>
>Dr. Reem Hatamleh, PhD, RN, RMW assistant professor in Midwifery Maternal and Child Health and Midwifery Department Jordan university of Science and Technology/ Faculty of Nursing mail address: P.O Box 3030 Irbid 22110, Jordan phone: 0096227201000 Ext, 23712 e.mail: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]
>
>
>On Sunday, July 1, 2018 09:16:33 PM EEST, Mechthild Gross <<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>
>
>Dear Hanna and all,
>
>
>
>administering a peripheral venous line as a routine procedure may increase the likelihood to administer drugs during labour and birth. Maybe it would be good to avoid doing it.
>
>Good luck
>
>
>
>Mechthild
>
>
>
>Prof. Dr. Mechthild M. Gross, Hebamme
>
>Head of Midwifery Research and Education Unit
>
>Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine
>
>Hannover Medical School
>
>Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1
>
>D 30625 Hannover
>
>Tel: ++49 511 532 6116, Fax: ++49 511 532 6191
>
>Mobil: ++49 176 1532 6116
>
><mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]
>
>www.mh-hannover.de/Hebammenwissenschaft.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Von: A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health research. [<mailto:[log in to unmask]>mailto:[log in to unmask]] Im Auftrag von Sandall, Jane
>Gesendet: Sonntag, 1. Juli 2018 15:02
>An: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]
>Betreff: Advice on physiologic birth
>
>
>
>Please see post from hannah Dahlen
>
>All replies to list please.
>
>
>
>Hi Brains Trust.
>
>
>
>I have a question for you. A few of us such as Holly Powell Kennedy, Soo Downe and Maralyn Foureur, Jane Sandall and I are trying to develop a phenotype of physiological birth (or undisturbed birth).
>
>
>
>This is based on the thrifty phenotype hypothesis (Barres & Zierath, 2016) where critical windows of development both in utero and childhood are associated with development of disease later in life.
>
>
>
>The EPIIC hypothesis <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23414680>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23414680 we published in 2013 posits that eustress (normal physiological stress) during the window of the actual labor and birth is protective by assuring that the hormonal physiology is supported and undisturbed (Dahlen et al, 2013).
>
>
>
>Below is a list we have come up with and we want to have it concise but not forget anything major. Please let us know what you think and if we have forgotten something important:
>
>
>
>Characteristics of “undisturbed” birth
>
> Spontaneous onset progression of labor to vaginal birth at term [37-42 weeks] of a singleton infant in cephalic presentation
>
> No pharmacologiic intervention (including antibiotics)
>
> Intermittent auscultation of the fetal heart
>
> No treatment required for blood loss
>
> Mother able to move about as desired
>
> Mother able to eat and drink as desired
>
> Mother able to be attended bby companions of choice
>
> Infant required no resuscitation
>
> Skin-to-skin>
>
> Delayed cord clampingg
>
> Infant ablle to breastfeed within one hour of birth
>
> Healthy mother who feels jooy and power
>
>
>
>Thanks as always for sharing your wisdom!
>
>
>
>Jane Sandall CBE
>
>Professor of Women's Health
>
>King's College London
>
><mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]
>
>07713 743150
>
>
>
>----------
>To unsubscribe from the MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH list, click the following link:
><https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jiscmail.ac.uk%2Fcgi-bin%2Fwebadmin%3FSUBED1%3DMIDWIFERY-RESEARCH%26A%3D1&data=02%7C01%7C%7C2d686b7cbe644b2c5bbb08d5df9d62d9%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636660789410192879&sdata=XWDh8TYy%2FHA4QywpVgKq%2F8hXvYKBwFQ0qsD9M5SnuiY%3D&reserved=0>https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH&A=1
>
>
>----------
>To unsubscribe from the MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH list, click the following link:
><https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jiscmail.ac.uk%2Fcgi-bin%2Fwebadmin%3FSUBED1%3DMIDWIFERY-RESEARCH%26A%3D1&data=02%7C01%7C%7C2d686b7cbe644b2c5bbb08d5df9d62d9%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636660789410192879&sdata=XWDh8TYy%2FHA4QywpVgKq%2F8hXvYKBwFQ0qsD9M5SnuiY%3D&reserved=0>https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH&A=1
>
>
>----------
>To unsubscribe from the MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH list, click the following link:
><https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jiscmail.ac.uk%2Fcgi-bin%2Fwebadmin%3FSUBED1%3DMIDWIFERY-RESEARCH%26A%3D1&data=02%7C01%7C%7C2d686b7cbe644b2c5bbb08d5df9d62d9%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636660789410349132&sdata=a0YxfrkYtRJ3AdCXoB5iwkYnHOiiIwb%2FSNVwLtRKttA%3D&reserved=0>https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH&A=1
>
>
>
>----------
>To unsubscribe from the MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH list, click the following link:
><https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH&A=1>https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH&A=1
>
>
>----------
>To unsubscribe from the MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH list, click the following link:
><https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH&A=1>https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH&A=1
>
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH&A=1
|