JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  February 2018

PHD-DESIGN February 2018

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: On gendered experiences in life & careers

From:

Susan Hagan <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 10 Feb 2018 10:23:12 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (143 lines)

Hi Keith,

I might have been trying to do too much too quickly. 

<snip>I’m not sure I follow all the distinctions you make, so, my comments in reply could go off-target.<snip>

Boy, do I understand that feeling. Mainly I was intrigued and wanted to stir that pot, because of how language might be able to both build and destroy communities. Your post about ways of conceptualizing actor, action, and the object of those actions reminded me of a speech Obama gave in 2009 that both took the agent out, and put the agent in, so that what he hoped would be a more unified community wouldn't be undermined at the outset. He states: 

<snip>“Short-term gains were prized over long-term
prosperity… we failed to look beyond the next payment, the next
quarter, or the next election… difficult decisions were put off for some
other time on some other day…”<snip>

It's so masterful in terms of the use of passive and active voice. Unfortunately, the Republicans had decided that their mission was to make sure Obama was unsuccessful (I wish I could sight the Washington Post here, but I read it too long ago.) So, there's a lot language can't do in the face of _______- you fill in the blank.


Back to your post: 
<snip>Taking the ACTOR out of a situation is certainly one of the consequences of ergative structures. Equally though, the ergative takes the RE-actor out of the situation.
Off line, Ken provided me with insights into missing aspects of my windy piece on ergative/accusative languages. One point he made, that I find has value here, is the potential misuses of the ergative. That is, when we take the agent out of the discussion then there is potential for misdirection of purpose, cover-up and even rhetorical denial.
I heard a nice misdirect from a banking executive recently where he used the negative as a cover-up for the positive. What he said was something like this:
“If I were to deny that the bank is in a bad position, then I would be telling a lie.”
What he didn’t say was:
“The bank has laundered millions of dollars from terrorist and criminal gangs.”
So, yes, I take the point as well made that the ergative, in itself, is not the answer to all situations just as the active and/or the passive are not the answers to all situations. Rhetoric is our master until we master rhetoric.<snip>


I think we are in agreement.


<snip>Remember I listed multiple sources of the accusative structure: theological, legal, scientific and psychological.
If I give an example we might be able to share more common ground. My example aims to include elements from what I saw I was aiming at, and what I see Susan aiming at (I could be wrong in both cases).<snip>


First, I love your candor and hope I share it. I think that this forum does allow for musing and opportunities to consider and reconsider.


<snip>TRIGGER WARNING – I am about to talk about racist and sexist stuff in technical ways that show NO respect for anyone’s feelings.

Wendy is white.

Billy is black

They are both pre-schoolers – they are meeting for the first time.

Wendy says to Billy “Hey, you’re black.”

Bill says, in reply: “Hey, you’re white.”

Wendy replies: “No I’m not, I’m mostly pink.”

Billy punches her in the nose, making her nose bleed and he says, triumphantly: “Now you’re a bit red.”

Wendy, in tears and disbelief cries: “Boys don’t hit girls.”

Following my suggestion from the earlier post, the teacher might take an ergative/inquisitorial approach to this situation.

Taking the inquisitorial approach, the teacher might establish that Wendy had never seen a black child before (Wendy’s context). Billy, on the other hand, may have been primed to respond to racist comments because his family is a minority family in the neighbourhood (Billy’s context).

Subsequently, the teacher runs a learning exercise where she explains differing cultures, races and genders and the appropriate ways in which we address each other, and respond to each other. No one hits anyone, ever.

Unless Wendy and Billy come to apprehend the new context which is something like “appropriate and inappropriate social relations”, then they will be left bewildered by a world in which Wendy wins because she is the immediate victim, and used her words, and Billy is the violent one, and long term victim, on his way to jail, because he can’t control his reactions in decentred ways.

These strategies are used in everyday situations is schools. What I was trying to indicate, in my previous post, was that we can DESIGN language situations to exemplify such strategies. The more rhetorically useful, non-accusative strategies we have, the better off we are. Why, because at the moment, in English-based cultures, the accusative dominates.

Ken suggested I needed to do research to justify this claim. He also highlighted that accusative approaches are totally required in many circumstances. I agree<snip.>

I wonder here if we're not also talking about reflection and discussion before reaction, leading to crafting language in ways that keeps the heat down. Billy still needs at least a time out. It's separate and apart from language use and later discussion. On this I hold to my earlier perspective that victims need justice and perpetrators need to experience the consequences of bad behavior. But I still think that you offer an intriguing perspective in terms of how we engage in discussions that seek to understand the problem as a whole and prevent future bloody noses in particular. Language and how it is structured, it's grammar and syntax also seem to me to play a role. 

<snip>Hope this helps<snip>

I'd say yes. I hope that what I wrote back is useful too.

Susan




















________________________________
From: PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Susan Hagan <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, 8 February 2018 9:39:55 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: On gendered experiences in life & careers

Hello All,

David I wanted to thank you for the implicit permission not to have to read the earlier thread. I apologize in advance for what I might have missed that will make this text part of the problem instead of a part of the discussion. I wouldn't be able to write otherwise.

Keith, I'm intrigued by your "windy" contribution concerning accusative versus ergative language. Not only does it take the actor out of the situation, but for me, by doing so, it potentially changes the context under which we consider the problem. Aitchson (2012) points out that when words change their meanings in new contexts, children (and others as I recall) find the change easy to accept. I'd say that scales out in situations like these. If we stay within the context of good and bad we might not get far. But if we change the context to "the kettle boiled—what do we do with it now"... well I wonder. (To be clear, this is not to say that perpetrators should just be forgiven or ignored. It's a different part of the conversation that I'm not focused on because I think that what Vicky said is the main point.)

But to finish Keith's post, I often wonder if a new pronoun is called for. Where I teach, the assumption is that a man wrote it. Maybe a gender neutral pronoun, would reinforce that, but maybe it would increase the potential for reflection.

Vicky, I think that what Keith writes links to your welcome notes on both understanding and dismantling by "calling out the discrepancies in experiences, followed by reflecting on these differences, and then finally determining how those reflections will help us to move forward."

Related to a pragmatic design example, one of those ways of calling out discrepancies in experience as well as reflecting and determining how to move forward that comes to mind for me is Lupton and Miller 's (1996) "White on Black on Grey" where the authors take a close look at examples of advertising from the 1960's to the mid '90's, focused on African Americans. One aspect of their argument that encourages me to reflect, relates to work that is done with the intention of addressing racism, but actually reinforces racist touch points.

Specifically, good intentions still failed to change the context when Herb Lubalin, whose work I admire about as much as one can, shows an African American in white face for an Ebony ad in the New York Times (1968). It says, "some American advertisers are color-blind." I thought of it as sharp and thought provoking—something I love about Lubalin. But that example also shows that he's forgotten the discrepancies in experience. This clever use of "color" ignores that the man in white face is being made to contribute to something that hurt so many people—and still does. I saw the clever in the re-appropriated history. I failed to see that he hadn't really changed the context.

Does that mean that we shouldn't use sarcasm to get a point across in situations of oppression? I honestly don't know. Perhaps we should be careful. When this kind of kettle is boiling, maybe reflection comes first?

All the best,

Susan


Susan M. Hagan Ph.D. MDes | Carnegie Mellon University in Qatar



-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list  <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------


-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list  <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list  <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager