JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for EVALUATION-OF-ONLINE-LEARNING Archives


EVALUATION-OF-ONLINE-LEARNING Archives

EVALUATION-OF-ONLINE-LEARNING Archives


EVALUATION-OF-ONLINE-LEARNING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

EVALUATION-OF-ONLINE-LEARNING Home

EVALUATION-OF-ONLINE-LEARNING Home

EVALUATION-OF-ONLINE-LEARNING  January 2018

EVALUATION-OF-ONLINE-LEARNING January 2018

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Primary Research Group has published the Survey of Best Practices in Student Assessment, 2018 Edition, ISBN 978-157440-491-3

From:

James Moses <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Evaluation of online learning <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 25 Jan 2018 15:46:12 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (19 lines)

Primary Research Group has published the Survey of Best Practices in Student Assessment, 2018 Edition, ISBN 978-157440-491-3

This highly detailed 181-page report presents the results of a survey of 54 higher education assessment administrators, relating their best practices and advice, and data on their program and technology use, budgets and expenditures, personnel policies, relations with faculty, testing policies and much more.  Other issues examined includes but is not limited to interviewing transfers, drop outs and graduates, post college results assessment, college and university role models for assessment and more.

Just a few of the report’s many finding are that:

•	On average, 55.56% of diagnostic tests administered to incoming students are web-based.  Examining trends by type of school, community colleges have the highest percentage of web-based assessments (87.33%), while research universities have the lowest (32.00%).  
•	Respondents most commonly said that ACT scores are a “modestly effective predictor” of student performance (32.73%) or a “good predictor” (23.64%).  Four-year degree institutions were most likely to say they are an “excellent predictor” (22.22%), with 0.00% of community colleges and research universities believing so.
•	Only 5.45% offer a standardized test in Library Services/Information Literacy
•	Research universities are most likely to describe student affairs departments as “very involved” in assessment efforts (42.86%), followed by four-year degree granting institutions (14.81%).  
•	The mean budget for the public college assessment offices in the sample was $225,000
•	About a quarter of schools have an “assessment day” or “assessment period” (25.45%).  They are most common at research universities (42.86%).

The following colleges and universities participated in the study:  Albertus Magnus College, Antioch College, Appalachian State University, Arkansas State University-Beebe, Augustana College, Bloomsburg University, Boston College, Broward College, Carleton University, Colorado College, Cornell College, CSU Dominguez Hills, Cuyahoga Community College, Delaware State University, Eastern Illinois University, Elon University, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Evangel University, Faulkner University, Furman University, Hannibal-LaGrange University, Ivy Tech Community College, Johnson & Wales University, Kansas State University, Le Moyne College, Life Chiropractic College West, Lincoln University, Lindenwood University-Belleville, Lyon College, Malone University, Menlo College, Meredith College, Michigan State University, Missouri Western State University, Monroe College, Murray State University, Prairie View A&M University, Sentara College of Health Sciences, Southern California University of Health Sciences, St. Paul's College, University of Manitoba, Stephen F. Austin State University, Stockton University, UAMS College of Pharmacy, UMUC (University of Maryland University College), United States Sports Academy, University of Alabama in Huntsville, University of North Florida, University of Northern Colorado, University of St. Thomas, University of TN at Martin, University of West Florida, University of Victoria, Vincennes University, York University

Data in the report is broken out for public and private colleges, by level of tuition, enrollment level and institutional type. A PDF version of the report is currently available from Primary Research Group for $112.00 and a print version of the report is in production and will be available for shipment on February 12th and can be ordered now.  Site licenses are also available. For a table of contents, excerpt and list of participants – or to place an order -- view the product page for this report at: https://www.primaryresearch.com/AddCart.aspx?ReportID=472

Or go to our main website at www.PrimaryResearch.com or call us at 212-736-2316.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
February 2018
January 2018
November 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
August 2016
July 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
January 2016
December 2015
October 2015
July 2015
April 2015
January 2015
November 2014
August 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
March 2011
January 2011
December 2010
September 2010
August 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
December 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager