JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for SISIG Archives


SISIG Archives

SISIG Archives


SISIG@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SISIG Home

SISIG Home

SISIG  December 2017

SISIG December 2017

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

AGAIN Unpublished BFI Report Revealed ‘The Corporate Finance of SMEs in the UK Film Industry’

From:

Paul McDonald <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Paul McDonald <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 14 Dec 2017 21:17:32 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (65 lines)

Dear SISIG Members
Just sent this but apologies for stupid error - 'addition' should of course have been 'edition'! Paul

This story by Andreas Wiseman is reposted from today's edition of Screen Daily.  


BFI-COMMISSIONED REPORT CRITICAL OF UK FILM INDUSTRY SURFACES AFTER THREE YEARS

A BFI-commissioned report critical of UK film companies and UK funding mechanisms has surfaced three years after it was delivered.

The report, authored by chartered accountant Northern Alliance, reveals widespread financial frailty within leading independent film companies from the production, distribution and sales sector.

Titled ‘The Corporate Finance Of SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises) in the UK Film Industry’, the report examined the financial health of 108 companies who ”made, sold or released the most successful independently produced and distributed British films between 2006 to 2013.”

The Northern Alliance analysis, which will not be published on the BFI’s website, was based on the latest accounts filed by the UK film companies to Companies House.

Northern Alliance also carried out a similarly structured report for the UK Film Council in 2009 in which UKFC CEO John Woodward admitted “concern” over the “generally frail state” of many UK film companies’ balance sheets.

Key findings of the 2014 report:

- accounting among distributors and producers ‘remains inconsistent and typically falls far short of US accounting requriements’

- a widespread failure to appreciate and accurately value intellectual property created by the UK film industry

- an almost systemic reliance on dilatory payment of creditors with some companies continuing to take over six months to settle debts

- few instances of private investment in film businesses and the ‘equity gap’ in the UK film industry appears as wide as it was in 2009

- public sector investment in film businesses, as opposed to film projects, continues to be nugatory [ie, of no value or importance]

- almost half of the businesses originally identified [in 2009] as producing, selling or distributing the best British films have subsequently ceased trading or appear to be in decline

No specific companies or individuals were named in the report, which also highlights that film companies best insulate themselves by simultaneously producing TV and through vertical integration.

The report highlighted the scale of the challenge facing new producers hoping to get ahead in the business:

“Whether this reflects an industry that is resistant to ‘new blood’ or simply that there is no substitute for experience in a highly complex area such as film production is beyond the scope of this study, but it appears that in terms of personnel the churn rate of producers within the upper echelons of the UK film industry is fairly low.”

It also found that having the support of a Hollywood studio can in fact be damaging:

“Whilst on a personal level working for a studio might be profitable, at a corporate level, the majority of the companies that enter into long-term arrangements with MPAA companies generate significant losses.”

The report, which is unusual for a BFI-commissioned study for the consistency of its criticism, only surfaced after it was brought to the attention of researcher Stephen Follows who was sent it by the BFI following a freedom of information request.

BFI comment

A BFI spokesperson commented to Screen on the report’s findings:

“The research that makes up the report’s findings are almost four years old and the issues that it raised are well-known, long-term and reflect the general pattern of the creative industries themselves.

”Both Film Forever (2012-2017) and BFI2022, BFI’s five year strategic plans are the result of extensive UK-wide industry consultation and address this holistically from education to audience development and supporting emerging talent, acknowledging that the UK film industry is highly complex and faces many challenges but that it also holds great potential, opportunity and is growing.

”As referenced in the introduction to BFI2022: ’While recognising the successes, we are aware that British film’s future is a complex one of great potential but also many challenges. For many UK filmmakers it can feel like tough going. There are genuine questions for us to consider about how independent British film can be supported to take advantage of its creative success to scale up and better compete in what should be an age of opportunity. Future economic value will come from more and better UK content being created, owned and then exported by UK businesses.’”

In response to a question from Screen asking why the report hadn’t been published, the organisation said:

“In order to fulfil our role as the lead organisation, the BFI needs to commission a variety of research to inform future policy development and understand the industry. Sometimes these are specifically commissioned for publication, for example our Statistical Yearbook, at other times research is commissioned which we don’t intend to publish, but, unless there are commercial sensitivities, we are always very happy to share them as we did in this case. This piece of research, commissioned more than three years ago, has been supplied to a number of researchers since that time.”

However, the fact the report wasn’t published by the BFI “surprised” its author at Northern Alliance. “It was surprising that the BFI didn’t publish the report, as the UK Film Council had published the original. I can’t recall receiving any formal explanation as to why the report wasn’t published,” Mike Kelly of Northern Alliance told Follows.

Since the report’s delivery the BFI has progressed sustainability initiatives including the Vision Awards and the ‘locked box’ scheme. It recently launched a commission on independent film which includes a number of key UK industry stakeholders.

You'll find the original story including a link to the report at:
https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.screendaily.com%2Fnews%2Fbfi-commissioned-report-critical-of-uk-film-industry-surfaces-after-three-years-%2F5125012.article%3Futm_medium%3Demail%26utm_campaign%3DBreaking%2520News%2520Dec%252014%26utm_content%3DBreaking%2520News%2520Dec%252014%2BCID_6e49dc27f007695104849cb3a58302c8%26utm_source%3DNewsletter%26utm_term%3DBFI-commissioned%2520report%2520critical%2520of%2520UK%2520film%2520industry%2520surfaces%2520after%2520three%2520years&data=01%7C01%7Cpaul.mcdonald%40KCL.AC.UK%7C90762504d24443990efd08d543377ac2%7C8370cf1416f34c16b83c724071654356%7C0&sdata=8IeHf2CcUKtWhAoifmeMZChxK3L11ozUL2NrpCNezxI%3D&reserved=0

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
April 2023
March 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
November 2021
October 2021
August 2021
June 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
October 2020
September 2020
May 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
May 2019
April 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
February 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager