JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  December 2017

PHD-DESIGN December 2017

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: The Future of Libraries

From:

Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 9 Dec 2017 12:04:37 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (77 lines)

Dear Chuck,

This is a good post. Nevertheless, in speaking about the library of the American Philosophical Society, you are speaking of a specialized research library established and funded for different purposes that university research libraries. Benjamin Franklin also founded the University of Pennsylvania, and it purpose is different to the purpose of the American Philosophical Society. If these and the Library Company of Philadelphia had all had the same purpose, Franklin would have only founded one organization instead of several.

Some of the systems you propose will also work for university research libraries when they are well enough funded. 

Philadelphia has several advantages. One of these is private foundations dating back to Benjamin Franklin’s time with a history of fundraising and public giving, along with some kinds of tax support. This creates a massive amount of capital on which these institutions draw to meet their foundation goals — human capital, social capital, financial capital.

To do this on a broader scale across the nation requires a serious public policy debate that the majority of Americans do not seem willing to consider. Funding more public goods requires that Americans and the people they elect must vote for and accept higher taxes. 

Since 1987, I have lived in nations where I pay roughly 50% of my income in taxes to support such public goods as libraries, public schools, hospitals, and universities. In some years, quirks in tax treaties or accounting problems meant that I paid as much as 66% of my income in taxes. I agree with the tax burden — my only complaint has been that on some occasions, I was charged for taxes that I did not owe. After paying all the taxes I did owe, that irked me. 

The challenge of living in a wealthy but underfunded nation such as America is that many organizations struggle simply to do what they were chartered to do. This is the case for many of the great university research libraries. If these libraries reach out to serve a broader public, they must do so at some cost to the main research mission within the research university. 

The solution is a shift in public policy, not a change to the mission of the research libraries that were designed to support research universities. Many of these libraries now struggle to perform their main chartered responsibility within the budgets on which they must survive.

Even the American Philosophical Society functions primarily to serve the goals of its members. It provides some public services — but other services cost money, and one must pay for them. For example, using the archived publications on JSTOR require a subscription. You benefit from access to some APS services as a nearby resident, and you are able to attend public programs. That doesn’t apply to everyone, everywhere. APS provides many admirable online services to the world at no cost — but even APS makes choices.

By and large, I agree with most of what you suggest. I am saying that this may not apply to university research libraries. 

Since the 1980s, the American states and the United States federal government have turned away from the concept of public goods on the principle that America will somehow build a better society by enriching and empowering those who are already wealthy. This position gained significant momentum since the election of the year 2000 with several rounds of tax cuts and rebates to the wealthy. Today, the differences are astounding. In 2010, 388 billionaires owned as much as the poorest 50% of the world’s population. In 2016, 8 multi-billionaires owned as much as the poorest 50%. 8 individuals owned as much as the poorest 3,800,000,000 people.

The problem is that we do not seem to understand as a global society how to solve the problems of inequality and public goods. This has given rise to a significant literature, for example,

Freeland, Chrystia. 2012. Plutocrats: The Rise of the New Global Super-Rich and the Fall of Everyone Else.

https://www.amazon.com/Plutocrats-Rise-Global-Super-Rich-Everyone/dp/0143124064

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Plutocrats-Rise-New-Global-Super-Rich/dp/0141043423

Temin, Peter. 2017. The Vanishing Middle Class. Prejudice and Power in a Dual Economy.

https://www.amazon.com/Vanishing-Middle-Class-Prejudice-Economy/dp/0262036169

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Vanishing-Middle-Class-Prejudice-Economy/dp/0262036169

Scheidel, Walter. 2017. The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century.

https://www.amazon.com/Great-Leveler-Inequality-Twenty-First-Princeton/dp/0691165025

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Great-Leveler-Inequality-Twenty-First-Princeton/dp/0691165025

These transformations operate at scale across societies. They limit what shrinking public funding can do. But understanding these problems doesn’t resolve the issue of what university research libraries ought to do. In the long term, I’d argue that we must consider different issues if we are to understand and fund large-scale public goods. This is a policy debate, not a question about the future of the university research library. Your subject header — “The Future of Libraries” — is interesting and important. I’m offering these comments to note that the public library and the university research library are different kinds of institution, and the private foundation research library such as the American Philosophical Society is yet another. 

If we are to expand the mission of the university research library, we must expand the funding we provide to those libraries.  

Yours,

Ken
 
—

Chuck Burnette wrote:

—snip—

Dear Colleagues,

I had a wonderful experience yesterday that brought me new appreciations of the past and new insights into possible futures for specialized research libraries, embodied meaning, and dictionary definitions. It began 3 blocks from my home  at the American Philosophical Society in a room containing almost all of Benjamin Franklin’s personal library, one of the incredible resources gathered by the Society since its founding by Franklin in 1743. There the curator of printed documents on all the many subjects covered there, explained not only what one could learn from what Franklin had read, but how he worked during his life from his compilation of almanacs, the complete set of which was there. The conservation of rare books, and how books were published in Franklin’s time and beyond up to a paper on the Eniac computer in Nature in the 1950’s were presented and discussed within our small group. In the 18th century people also formed organizations to share and discuss books.  One became  the Athenaeum of Philadelphia, an excellent research library that offers high definition scanning services to other Art Institutions in the City as well as digital access to its extensive resources on 19th century architecture. The American Institute of Architects was organized there even as it remains a private circulating library with an outstanding speaker series and a program of awards for local authors. My point here is simply that both wonderful organizations have outstanding programs that reach beyond their membership to address issues of knowledge and culture both locally and abroad.   Both also happen to be specialized research libraries with unusual histories and broader visions of their role. They have become my favorite institutions.

The evening at APS continued with a highly informative and entertaining talk by Kory Stamper, author of the celebrated new book "Word by Word: the Secret Life of Dictionaries". During the talk I began to realize that the theory of embodied meaning had no role in dictionaries in which descriptive definitions rely on epistemologies and examples of word use that lack intentional and contextual grounding. I began to think about the theories of Lakoff and Johnson and how they build on recurring patterns of embodied experience expressed through conceptual metaphors appropriate to the thinker’s purpose and the context of their expression. I thought that the many examples that have been the subject of research offer a sufficient basis for a trial of whether dictionaries could be designed on this model for instant adaption of term to subject by AI software. It should greatly enable the situation based interpretation and recall of information during communication if subject, background, and context can be established before processing, the idea I mentioned in my first reply to Don.

Incidentally, Old Philadelphia is a great place to live, because there are so many excellent institutions, many the first of their kind, and the oldest. 

Or so I believe,

Chuck

—snip—


-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list  <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager