Dear Shijun,
it is always difficult to answer such questions without very specific information, like e.g. exact error messages, and exact description what was done.
In addition to what others wrote, I see two general ways to solve the problem:
a) talk to the beamline people. They should know very well how to process the data collected at their beamline, and the procedures should be documented on the beamline web pages (though I did not find anything at http://ssrf.sinap.ac.cn/english/3/BL17U1.htm).
b) make a dataset available by Dropbox or Google Drive or the like, and ask the software developers for help
In the specific case of XDS, there are several ways to obtain XDS.INP:
1) the beamline software should write it
2) try
generate_XDS.INP <some_master>.h5
but important details may be wrong if the developers of generate_XDS.INP don't know the specifics of the particular beamline (the XDSwiki article called "Beamline notes" indicates that ROTATION_AXIS=-1 0 0 should probably be used). This is why a dataset from that beamline would be useful.
3) there is a nice script XDS_from_H5.py that can be obtained from https://strucbio.biologie.uni-konstanz.de/xdswiki/index.php/Eiger#Script_for_generating_XDS.INP_from_master.h5 which should generate a good XDS.INP
In case of XDSGUI, either H5ToXds must be installed, or the Neggia plugin must be available and specified in menu/settings - but this is _only_ needed to show a frame in the "Frame" tab, _not_ for running XDS by XDSGUI.
HTH,
Kay
On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 16:50:11 +0800, 张士军 <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear all
>
> I just collected some data with Eiger16M whose file format is *.h5. But I cannot read it with HKL2000, because I don't have the Eiger16M
> detector license now, while, I have *.cbf detector license. So I transfered the *.h5 to *.cbf files, but the problem is XDSGUI still cannot read
> them,and HKL2000 can read it, can search peak, but cannot index it with warning me ''no enough peaks to index the data'',when I check the
> peaks are much enough to index, whearas dials can read it, but the cell parameters are not the same with before. Anyone can tell me what's
> wrong with it? Thanks a lot !!!
>
> Best Regards
>
> Shijun
|