It sounds a bit like this paper from a year ago:
https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms12549
apart from the conclusion: here the point is that amateurs build
higher quality models than crystallographers.
On 20 November 2017 at 20:25, Shintaro Aibara <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Apologies for the slightly off-topic, but I was wondering if anybody knew of
> a paper/textbook where a protein model was built by multiple people (ranging
> from novice to experienced builders) and compared. I believe the conclusion
> was that while the overall trace was broadly correct, experienced builders
> maintained better geometry compared to beginners.
>
> I distinctly remember reading it a couple of years ago but cannot seem to
> find the figure. If anybody knows of this figure/paper/textbook it would be
> much appreciated if you could point me in the direction.
>
> Yours faithfully,
> Shintaro
|