Hi Sci-Com peeps,
Spotted this in today's Guardian - https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/nov/01/artificial-intelligence-risks-gm-style-public-backlash-experts-warn
Now I'd hope that sci-com professionals could help in this case, but it does seem that we're not learning from previous experience of failure to engage over new technology.
What's the cause of this? Funding? People not seeing the importance of good communications? Or is the message getting across - given that this is a warning in advance of the problem?
Answers on a postcard...
Steve
**********************************************************************
psci-com how-to:
Once subscribed, send emails for the list to [log in to unmask] If not subscribed, either subscribe here https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=psci-com or send requests for items to be posted on your behalf to [log in to unmask]
To unsubscribe (or silence messages while away) send an email (any subject) to [log in to unmask] with one of the following messages (ignoring text in brackets)
• signoff psci-com (to leave the list)
• set psci-com nomail (to stop receiving messages while on holiday)
• set psci-com mail (to resume getting messages)
Contact list owner at [log in to unmask]
Small print and JISCMail acceptable use policy https://sites.google.com/site/pscicomjiscmail/the-small-print
**********************************************************************
|