On 05/05/2017 09:08, Mark Sandler wrote:
> great idea but not sure how to do it.
>
> really ought to use linked data technologies, or we are not practicing what we preach. and there would be a URL from the project web site too i reckon.
I think I could put something together quite quickly with Annalist if someone 
can provide me with the raw details.

The existing performance definitions created for the Carmina/Phil Langran 
concert (fast-project.annalist.net/annalist/c/Performances/) could be a starting 
point for this.  We could look to expand this with Climb!-specific details to 
capture aspects of the performance variability.

#g
--

> m
>
> *********
> professor mark sandler, FREng
> FIEEE, FAES, FIET
> royal society wolfson research merit award holder
>
> director of the centre for digital music (c4dm)
>
> school of electronic engineering and computer science
> queen mary university of london
>
> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> +44 (0)20 7882 7680; +44 (0)7775 016715
>
> @markbsandler,
> @semanticaudio to follow the FAST-IMPACt Programme Grant
>
>
> On 5 May 2017, at 08:59, Christopher Greenhalgh <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
> It would be good to have an online browseable archive of the performances of Climb! that we can add material to as soon as each performance happens (so ideally it would be in place for the premiere on the 8th June)
>
> -          What is the preferred “fast impact” way of doing this?
> (e.g. based on grateful dead archive software, or something else?)
> -          Who can contribute effort to this?
>
> Cheers
> Chris
>
>
>
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.
>
> Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
> message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
> author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
> University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
> computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
> permitted by UK legislation.
>
>