Under Planning, does anyone else accept the submission of information direct from the developer/applicant to enable the discharge of conditions? We have a questionnaire template which we used to allow applicants to complete for small-scale sites (e.g. replacement dwellings, back garden developments). The purpose of this was to avoid the need for a full contaminated land investigation on small-scale sites and so keeping the costs down for the developer. The questionnaire asks for a brief site history, any on-site waste disposal, asbestos etc. In accordance with the NPPF, it is my understanding that all assessments must be undertaken by a competent person (e.g. consultant). In my view, I put the condition on to ensure that a proper risk assessment is undertaken. Personally, I dont see any value in the questionnaire approach - the author would not be deemed a competent person under the NPPF and they arent about to reveal information which would result in more cost/work anyway. Plus if I condition the application because of a nearby potentially contaminative use, then the questionnaire won't adequately address this. I've withdrawn it, to the horror of many a back garden developer! Just wanted to see if anyone else was of the same/differing opinion
Thanks very much
|