Hi all.
OK, so it seems like this time slot is difficult and/or people were generally not available this week.
We wouldn’t have a quorum this week for an important discussion to determine the next steps.
Will create a doddle poll so that we can re-establish a mtg time that works for all.
cheers
C
> On 14 Mar 2017, at 09:32, Costas Andreopoulos <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> Marco’s talk last Friday outlined the status of the tuning tools.
> There was very good progress with updating the comparisons, standardising formats for Professor,
> and developing the necessary scripts. We can (or know how to) exchange with Professor all information
> we need. We also have some of the basic diagnostic tools to tell us when something looks funny.
>
> Can we have another mtg this week to try to specify jointly the next stages of the CC0pi fit.
> I think that within 2-3 iterations it could converge to a result we can publish.
>
> Does this Friday (9 am CT) work for everybody?
>
> cheers
> C
|