Hi Robert,
Thanks again for your reply. Much appreciated.
If it comes down to personal preference, I have to say I'm inclined to agree with you and continue to use the storedId connector.
Kind regards,
Keith
-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion list for Shibboleth developments [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Robert Bradley
Sent: 17 February 2017 15:44
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: IdPv3 eduPersonTargetedID
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 17/02/17 10:43, Keith Carr wrote:
> Thanks for your reply below - that would seem to be a great
> suggestion. Can I ask; would this be the "recommended" way to do this
> (as of course it starts to move away from something being
> depreciated). Or is it preferable the storedId data connector continue
> to be used for the time being?
My personal understanding of this is that the choice of storedId vs.
calculatedId is mostly a matter of preference than anything else. In your case, I would stick to using the storedId connector, given you're already using it.
- --
Dr Robert Bradley
Identity and Access Management Team, IT Services, University of Oxford -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=7c+n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|