I'd like to call your attention to a recent report published by the
RDA-CODATA Legal Interoperability Interest Group, which discusses many
of these issues and recommends CC0 or PDDL, but also recognizes that
these may not be appropriate in all cases and that CC-BY is an option
in some situations:
LEGAL INTEROPERABILITY OF RESEARCH DATA:
PRINCIPLES AND IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
https://zenodo.org/record/162241#.WHPjWn39k7s
See in particular the text supporting Guideline 1C starting on page
10.
The Legal Interoperability Interest Group will be meeting at the next
Research Data Alliance Plenary in Barcelona in April...we encourage
you to participate if interested! We will be discussing plans for
follow-on activities regarding the Principles and Guidelines,
including additional outreach and sector-specific implementation
efforts.
Cheers, Bob
*****
Dr. Robert S. Chen
Director, Center for International Earth Science Information Network
(CIESIN), The Earth Institute, Columbia University
Manager, NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC)
P.O. Box 1000, 61 Route 9W, Palisades, NY 10964 USA
tel. +1 845-365-8952; fax +1 845-365-8922
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
CIESIN web site: http://www.ciesin.columbia.edu
SEDAC web site: http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu
On Mon, 9 Jan 2017, Amy L. Nurnberger wrote:
> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 12:48:06 -0500
> From: Amy L. Nurnberger <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: Research Data Management discussion list
> <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: CC0 licensing for institutional data
>
> Hi, all,
>
> We are undergoing some technical transitions in our IR, and part of the upgrades will include
> more detailed rights language and management. As part of this, my intent is to go for CC0 for
> data by default, and along with that include reference to something like the Force11 data
> citation principles
> (https://www.force11.org/group/joint-declaration-data-citation-principles-final) to provide
> context for norms.
> Best,
> Amy
> _________________________________
> Amy Nurnberger, Research Data Manager
> Center for Digital Research and Scholarship
> Columbia University / 212.851.2827
> E-mail: [log in to unmask]
> ORCID: 0000-0002-5931-072X
> Twitter: @DataAtCU
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Lake, Sherry Heitchew (sah) <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hello Robert, et al:
>
> Libra Data, University of Virginia’s local installation of Dataverse, uses the Dataverse
> “Community Norm” CC0 license:
> http://www.library.virginia.edu/libra/datasets/libra-data-community-norms/
> http://dataverse.org/best-practices/dataverse-community-norms
>
> The Uva Dataset deposit license states that CC0 is the default (although Libra Data –
> Dataverse, does have an option of custom data usage license agreements).
> http://www.library.virginia.edu/libra/datasets/public-dataset-license/
>
> --
>
> Sherry Lake
>
>
> Sherry Lake | Scholarly Repository Librarian | University of Virginia Library |
> [log in to unmask] | 434.924.6730 | @shLakeUVA | Alderman Library, 160 N. McCormick
> Road, Charlottesville, VA 22903 | Alderman 563 | LinkedIn Profile | “Keeper of the
> Dataverse"
>
>
>
>
> From: Research Data Management discussion list <[log in to unmask]> on behalf
> of Robert Darby <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: Research Data Management discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Monday, January 9, 2017 at 5:48 AM
> To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: CC0 licensing for institutional data
>
> Hello all
>
>
>
> I was wondering if any institutional data repositories are using or considering use of CC0
> as the recommended/default licensing option for research data (where no restrictive
> requirements exists)? We offer all CC options in our Research Data Archive but currently
> CC BY is the recommended/default option
> (https://researchdata.reading.ac.uk/data_policy.html).
>
>
>
> I’m persuaded of the case for use of CC0 where possible:
>
>
>
> - it is easy to understand for data depositors and prospective users of data, and
> applicable whatever the jurisdiction;
>
> - it eliminates possible barriers to re-use inherent in restrictive licensing (e.g.
> complicated attribution stacking for aggregated data), thus enabling the widest possible
> re-use of data;
>
> - removing the legal attribution requirement does not affect the creators’ right to
> receive credit through acknowledgement and citation, which is enforced through the norms
> of scholarly communication;
>
> - it expresses a clear pro-open research position on the part of the University and its
> researchers.
>
>
>
> CC0 is mandated for all data submitted to the Dryad digital repository: see ‘Why does
> Dryad use Creative Commons Zero?’ at http://datadryad.org/pages/faq. There’s a BMC
> editorial from 2012 that makes the case compellingly: Hrynaszkiewicz, I. and Cockerill, M.
> (2012), ‘Open by default: a proposed copyright license and waiver agreement for open
> access research and data in peer-reviewed journals’. BMC Research Notes.
> http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-494.
>
>
>
> I’d to recommend we make CC0 our preferred licence for data deposited in our institutional
> repository (with all other options remaining available and at the depositor’s discretion).
> Does anyone know of a reason why we might not want to do this?
>
>
>
> Any thoughts would be gratefully received.
>
>
>
> Robert
>
>
>
> Dr Robert Darby | Research Data Manager | Research and Enterprise | University of Reading
> | Whiteknights House 201 | PO Box 217 | Reading RG6 6AH
>
> | T: +44 (0)118 378 6161 | E: [log in to unmask] | [log in to unmask]
>
> Twitter: @robert_darby17
>
> http://www.reading.ac.uk/reas-ResearchDataManagement.aspx
>
> Opening Research at Reading Blog:http://blogs.reading.ac.uk/open-research/
>
>
>
>
>
>
|
