Hi Steve,
Did you see John’s response earlier?
The suggestion is "an LHCb SAM client bug and not a site issue”. This will be checked and you will likely want to get a revised figure calculated.
Thanks,
Jeremy
> On 7 Dec 2016, at 22:02, sjones <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> On 2016-12-07 16:52, Jeremy Coles wrote:
>> Please could: RHUL, Glasgow and Liverpool send me some brief text on
>> the difficulties encountered during the month.
>
> There were no significant difficulties in November at Liverpool regarding availability and reliability prior to a power cut in late November that wiped out our ARC/Condor CE, but we recovered within 6 hours or so. Thus we did practically a full month of work at near 100% reliability & availability.
>
> My figures suggest we made 6.3 million hs06 hours of work for lhcb in Nov, which is indicative of (say) 99% uptime. It would not be possible if we were up only 33% of the time. I'll check this in the morning but this looks like a serious measurement error to me.
>
> To do that, I need to know; what is the basis of the 33% measurement, and who is responsible for making it?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ste
|