Can I offer http://doi.org/10.14469/hpc/1267 as a real working example of linking data and publications. The DOI refers to a collection with links to 14 datasets (with their own DOIs) and then in the “Associated DOIs” (which conforms to the DataCite schema) links not only to the journal publication, but also to other supplementary sources, including a presentation at a conference.
As I noted earlier today, PIDapalooza in Iceland had many interesting sessions which strive to broaden the scope of PIDs, including assigning them to both conferences as a whole and individual presentations. I hope however that this does not induce too much PID fatigue in the community!
As for issues regarding such linking, I might flag one potential issue that I experienced (as a user) in creating the above. Our metaphor (doi: http://doi.org/10.17616/R3K64N ) is based around collections, which can themselves contain either datasets or further collections. In fact the nesting of collections could be deep, and as we found, potentially even cyclically recursive. I did remove such instances, but they could still occur by accident, with unpredictable consequences if metadata collections are attempted.
Henry Rzepa
> On 17 Nov 2016, at 12:52, Rachel Proudfoot <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> ** Apologies for cross posting**
>
> Forwarded message from Rachael Kotarski (and myself). Do contact one of us if you have any issues or experiences about linking publications and data, particularly around allocating and minting DOIs – or any other identifier issues.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Rachel
>
>
> Rachel Proudfoot
> Research Data Management Advisor
> Leeds University Library
> 0113 343 4554
> https://library.leeds.ac.uk
> http://researchdata.leeds.ac.uk/
> Twitter: @UoLLibrary
>
>
> From: British Library Data Citation Users Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of datasets
> Sent: 16 November 2016 09:28
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Request for examples: Institutional data repository workflows with publishers
>
> Dear All,
>
> Rachel Proudfoot and I are attending the THOR publishing workflows workshop on the 28th and 29th November. Rachel will be representing institutional data repositories in this, and I will be there to back her up!
>
> It would be really useful if we had more examples of what can go right, or wrong, with those workflows. As this is a THOR workshop, it will be focussed on persistent identifiers and how they are assigned and transferred within publishing workflows, so please bear that in mind.
>
> If you have any experiences you can share of how you assign or transfer identifiers (thinking ORCID iDs as well as object IDs such as DOIs) for data deposits where the researcher is trying to coincide data release with the publication of a paper, please do send them to me, [log in to unmask] I will also pass them on to Rachel.
>
> Please note these can be as anonymous as you like – just let me know when you send it if you don’t even want us to mention the institution, although if we could that might help.
>
> I am also at RDMF next week – so if you are there and just want to talk through an example, let me know and I will try and find you in Edinburgh!
>
> With pre-emptive thanks,
> Rachael.
>
>
>
> Rachael Kotarski
> Data Services and Content Lead
> The British Library, 96 Euston Road, London NW1 2DB
>
> Tel: 020 7412 7167 | Email: [log in to unmask]
>
> | Datasets@BL | DataCite | Twitter |
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ******************************************************************************************************************
> Experience the British Library online at www.bl.uk
> The British Library’s latest Annual Report and Accounts : www.bl.uk/aboutus/annrep/index.html
> Help the British Library conserve the world's knowledge. Adopt a Book. www.bl.uk/adoptabook
> The Library's St Pancras site is WiFi - enabled
> *****************************************************************************************************************
> The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this e-mail and notify the [log in to unmask] : The contents of this e-mail must not be disclosed or copied without the sender's consent.
> The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the British Library. The British Library does not take any responsibility for the views of the author.
> *****************************************************************************************************************
> Think before you print
|
