Hi,
So far we tried to correct the last few months (June onward), but the
accounting period used for funding will now be October 2015-October 2016
http://tinyurl.com/jerzxdx
You might want to check your accounting is in line for the whole period
I know some sites have a slighter paler shade of green for a couple of
months - like Lancaster - and maybe not worth the effort, but QMUL and
Liverpool not previously considered for reviewing have a much lighter
shade for a longer period and IMO should look into it. Others with
isolated red cells not sure what to suggest. I did look at the
Manchester one and the problem is not in APEL so for GridPP it is ok.
Let me know if you need any help.
cheers
alessandra
On 03/10/2016 17:03, Alessandra Forti wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> the accounting TF has now a dashboard to compare results from the
> experiments accounting records with the APEL results.
>
> This contains all the experiments latest values which are updated each
> month with the numbers of the previous finished month.
>
> http://wlcg-mon-dev.cern.ch/dashboard/request.py/siteview#currentView=ACCOUNTING_VALIDATION&search_0=UKI-&sorting_Site+Name=asc
>
>
> There is also an historical view these are the UK sites from January
> until August
>
> http://tinyurl.com/gvuxue2
>
> Most UK sites are ok, there are however 3 problematic sites which have
> RED more often than not UCL, RHUL and ECDF. Brunel was red in August
> and September too.
>
> If you click on each month there is a json file with the numbers for
> the month contained in the Status field the elements of the array of
> numbers are: HS06 on the atlas dashboard, HS06 in APEL, ratio,
> wallclock in ATLAS, wallclock in APEL, wallclock ratio. For example
> ECDF in August http://tinyurl.com/hq8tfvt
>
> Status": "123600,55882,45,11771,4299,37"
>
> APEL HS06 value 55882 is 45% the ATLAS dashb value 123600
> The APEL wallclock 4299 is 37% of the ATLAS dashb value 11771
>
> Sometimes the discrepancies are the other way, i.e. APEL much bigger
> than ATLAS. ATLAS gets the numbers only for the payload, while APEL
> gets the numbers from the batch system including all the pilot time,
> so in theory APEL should always be slightly bigger. Whatever the
> numbers they should be within 15-20% difference once way or the other.
>
> I've put these pages in the links page
>
> https://www.gridpp.ac.uk/wiki/Links_Monitoring_pages#Accounting
>
> Let me know if you have any comment. Can UCL, RHUL, ECDF and Brunel
> help me understand their discrepancies please?
>
> cheers
> alessandra
>
>
>
--
Respect is a rational process. \\//
Fatti non foste a viver come bruti (Dante)
|