JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives


MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives


MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Home

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Home

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH  October 2016

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH October 2016

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

FW: [ganm] Controversy Surrounding Bed-Sharing

From:

"McCourt, Christine" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health research." <[log in to unmask]>, McCourt, Christine

Date:

Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:42:29 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

Forwarding this as I think of interest to the list. A very interesting and information response – thanks Caroline for passing it on. 


On 31/10/2016 12:44, "Caroline Homer" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

    Dear colleagues
    
    In response to this email trail, I asked my colleague Prof Jeanine Young (University of the Sunshine Coast) who led the Australian College of Midwives Position Statement for her views. I attach her response below. She is happy to be contacted individually if you have questions as she is not on this list. Her email is Jeanine Young <[log in to unmask]>.
    
    Caroline Homer
    
    
    Dear Caroline
    
    I think all statements are saying the same thing (RCM and UNICEF and ACM and SIDS and Kids)- we all acknowledge the safest place for a baby is in a separate sleeping space in close proximity to a parent but all acknowledge that parents will fall asleep with babies whether intended or not.
    
    What is changing is the acknowledgement that the message never bedshare is not working and may create greater risk.
    
    I attended the biannual ISPID ISA conference in Uruguay, in September 2016 just before the release of the revised AAP guidelines. We presented our preliminary work on the Pēpi-Pod® Program and the Qld SUDI study.
    
    The tide appears to be turning in the international community with regard to the initial ‘simple’ message of tell parents never to bed-share. This has not worked over the last 10 years and it was acknowledged that babies still continue to die in unsafe sleeping environments in which there are other risk factors present, despite this ‘simple’ message (risk elimination approach). The vast majority of deaths are in families who have complex needs and are socially vulnerable. It was acknowledged in a forum that focussed on bed-sharing data that the simple message is not appropriate across cultures and that other interventions and support are needed for complex families who may have no choice but to bed-share as they have no room for a separate sleep space (eg smokers living in a small caravan may not have room for a cot in their living environment).
    
    Death data overwhelmingly demonstrates that an infant death to a non-smoking, breastfeeding mother is a very rare event. For example, of SUDI deaths in Qld between 2012-2014 there were 152, of which 135 were sleep related. 43% were in shared sleeping situations (n=58), the rest were not. Of those 58 babies, when we considered risk factors of smoking, not breastfeeding and prone position – only 1 baby was in a shared situation in which there he was breastfed, mother was a non-smoker and he was placed supine to sleep. This baby was Indigenous, male and born preterm and low birth weight (SGA). No babies had no known risk factors present. The Victorian retrospective case series published earlier this year also supports these findings (Bugeja, Dwyer, McIntyre, Young Stephan and McClure 2016).
    
    The revised AAP guidelines published in October 2016 are more in keeping with current risk minimisation guidelines than before (AAP 2011 which stated do not bedshare) due to the acknowledgement that a breastfeeding  mother may fall asleep when feeding her baby. Due to the increase of sofa sharing and lounge chair deaths associated with feeding a baby and falling asleep, with parental narratives in death scene investigations indicating this was because they had been told not to bedshare, it has been acknowledged that the initial ‘never bedshare’ message was oversimplified and may in fact cause greater harm. The Carpenter analysis from 2013 (which was cited as stating risk is increased regardless of non-smoking and breastfeeding) has been regarded as somewhat limited given it imputed 60% of missing data particularly from studies which did not collect data on alcohol consumption. A subsequent review in 2014 of studies which collected data in similar ways (included in our ACM statement) supports the current ACM Statement conclusion of risk minimisation.
    
    The revised guidelines states: The safest place for an infant to sleep is on a separate sleep surface designed for infants close to the parents’ bed. However, the AAP acknowledges that parents frequently fall asleep while feeding the infant. Evidence suggests that it is less hazardous to fall asleep with the infant in the adult bed than on a sofa or armchair, should the parent fall asleep. It is important to note that a large percentage of infants who die of SIDS are found with their head covered by bedding. Therefore, no pillows, sheets, blankets, or any other items that could obstruct infant breathing or cause overheating should be in the bed. Parents should also follow safe sleep recommendations outlined elsewhere in this statement. Because there is evidence that the risk of bed-sharing is higher with longer duration, if the parent falls asleep while feeding the infant in bed, the infant should be placed back on a separate sleep surface as soon as the parent awakens.
    
    This is also consistent with our Australian SIDS and Kids (now Red Nose Foundation) Bedsharing statement that was revised last year which clear states the support of a risk minimisation approach – consistent with the ACM statement
    
    The focus has moved now to ensuring widespread awareness of 
    •	the dangers of falling asleep on a sofa, 
    •	avoiding bed-sharing if either parents smokes, takes prescription or illicit drugs that may reduce consciousness or drinks alcohol
    •	sleeping with a premature or low birth weight baby (this of course provides an excellent opportunity to educate about safe sleeping during KMC in SCBUs and NICUs although clinicians rarely seem to make this link)
    
    The revised AAP guidelines (2016) also referred to devices that make bedsharing safe. 
    
    There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against the use of devices promoted to make bedsharing “safe.” There is no evidence that these devices reduce the risk of SIDS or suffocation or are safe. Some products designed for in-bed use (in-bed sleepers) are currently under study but results are not yet available.
     
    “some products designed for in bed use are currently under study’ was an indirect reference to the NZ Pēpi-Pod® Program and Wahakura programs – recently associated with the 29% reduction in infant mortality  seen in NZ, Mitchell et al 2016 (June), Acta Paediatrica) and our Qld Pepi-Pod Program. Several sites in the UK, Canada and the US are about to take up similar programs of in bed sleep enablers and targeted safe sleep education for vulnerable families due to the preliminary results with these devices. We will be able to geographically map services which are using our program (over 25 communities in Qld, with several services integrating into health service delivery following the trial with all other participating sites expressing a desire to continue with funding available. The Rural Doctors Association of Qld Foundation have, as of last week, donated money to us to purchase another 100 pods to continue our program while WA, Victoria and NSW departments of health are making enquiries into trial. SA has purchased 20 Pepi-Pods and are able to trial also.
    
    I am proud that  the ACM guidelines 2014 clearly stated and supported the need for a risk minimisation approach as this is now being viewed by the international community as the way forward. Midwives caring for families are in unique position as an advocate, educator and health promoter for vulnerable families and therefore should express their views as to safe options for families particularly when current evidence does not demonstrate that the risk elimination approach is working.
    
    Professor Jeanine Young
    School of Nursing and Midwifery
    University of the Sunshine Coast
    
    
    Caroline Homer RM PhD
    Professor of Midwifery, Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health
    Associate Dean: International and Development
    Associate Head, WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Development
    
    Faculty of Health | University of Technology Sydney
    Jones St, Ultimo 2007  (PO Box 222)
    T +61 2 9514 4886 M 0418 466 974 
    S caroline.homer E [log in to unmask] W health.uts.edu.au  T @CarolineHomer
    W http://www.uts.edu.au/staff/caroline.homer
    
    Executive Assistant:  Carole Boucherie
    E:  [log in to unmask]
    T:  + 61 2 9514 5270
    
    
    Top ranked in Australia for Human Movement & Sports Science, Nursing & Midwifery (2015 ERA 5/5) and Public Health & Health Services research (2015 ERA 4/5)
    
    President: Australian College of Midwives
    Honorary Visiting Professor, Kings College London
    Honorary Visiting Professor, Cardiff University
    
    
    
    
    I acknowledge the Gadigal People of the Eora Nation, upon whose ancestral lands UTS stands. I pay my respects to the Elders both past and present, acknowledging them as the traditional custodians of knowledge for this land. 
    
    The Faculty of Health considers Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples’ health to be everybody’s business, and acknowledges that ongoing colonisation and racism are vital determinants impacting on the health of Indigenous peoples. We are therefore committed to supporting all staff and students to develop new knowledge and skills that will enable meaningful engagement with Indigenous peoples, communities and their organisations.
    
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Darlene Nnanyelugoh
    Sent: Friday, 28 October 2016 6:19 AM
    To: GANM (Global Alliance for Nursing and Midwifery)
    Subject: [ganm] Controversy Surrounding Bed-Sharing
    
    Because the infant sleeping recommendations you shared are from physicians (specifically the American Academy of Pediatrics), I did a little search on official stances from midwifery organizations.
    
    Per the Australian College of Midwives (ACM), ACM “does not support a risk elimination approach in which all parents are informed not to bed-share or co-sleep with their baby under any circumstances.” This is in conflict with the physicians’ recommendation that parents should not bed-share with their infant. ACM does acknowledge though that bed-sharing increases the risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome.
    
    Even among midwives there is some disagreement on co-sleeping. The U.K.’s Royal College of Midwives (RCM) recommends that “the safest place for baby to sleep is in a cot in his or her parent's room and not in the bed with parents.”
    
    How can we gain consensus in the global midwifery community? And what should we be telling parents?
     
    Link to ACM position: https://www.midwives.org.au/resources/acm-position-statement-co-sleeping-and-bed-sharing  
    Link to RCM position: https://www.rcm.org.uk/content/do-not-sleep-in-bed-with-baby-say-midwives-20-05-13
    __________
    
    The GANM is part of the Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing PAHO/WHO Collaborating Center.
    
    The thoughts, opinions and views that are posted on the GANM do not reflect those of either Johns Hopkins University or WHO.
    
    Please visit the GANM webpage at: http://knowledge-gateway.org/ganm/
    
    If you want to reply privately, read below.
    
    You are receiving this message because you're a member of the community GANM (Global Alliance for Nursing and Midwifery). 
    
    View this contribution on the web site https://knowledge-gateway.org/_/kj5w9gxs
    
    
    A reply to this message will be sent to all members of GANM (Global Alliance for Nursing and Midwifery).
    To reply to sender, send a message to [log in to unmask]
    To unsubscribe, send an email to [log in to unmask]
    
    
    UTS CRICOS Provider Code: 00099F
    DISCLAIMER: This email message and any accompanying attachments may contain confidential information.
    If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message or
    attachments. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete
    this message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the
    sender expressly, and with authority, states them to be the views of the University of Technology Sydney.
    Before opening any attachments, please check them for viruses and defects.
    
    Think. Green. Do.
    
    Please consider the environment before printing this email.
    
    __________
    
    The GANM is part of the Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing PAHO/WHO Collaborating Center.
    
    The thoughts, opinions and views that are posted on the GANM do not reflect those of either Johns Hopkins University or WHO.
    
    Please visit the GANM webpage at: http://knowledge-gateway.org/ganm/
    
    If you want to reply privately, read below.
    
    You are receiving this message because you're a member of the community GANM (Global Alliance for Nursing and Midwifery). 
    
    View this contribution on the web site https://knowledge-gateway.org/_/slaytg2x
    
    
    A reply to this message will be sent to all members of GANM (Global Alliance for Nursing and Midwifery).
    To reply to sender, send a message to [log in to unmask]
    To unsubscribe, send an email to [log in to unmask]
    

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager