> On Oct 20, 2016, at 3:22 PM, Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Recent minutes of the Data Shapes Working Group [1] refer to what looks
> like a new description of Shapes Expression Language (ShEx) [2].
Eric and I are together at a workshop, and he disappeared a while yesterday to work on this, apparently. It seems that ShEx is not compatible with SHACL, and can produce SHACL directly, making the two shape models consistent, although it still retains it’s direct JSON representation that can be used to validate directly.
Gregg
> Tom
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2016/10/11-shapes-minutes
> [2] https://shexspec.github.io/spec/
>
> --
> Tom Baker <[log in to unmask]>
|