Of course I've considered that - I've even provided extensive argument at least in part to support your position, cf. my last post on Machado.
Jamie
> On 24 Oct 2016, at 13:32, David Lace <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Have you considered that my original position might be sound enough? I have merely been defending that original position. I see no point in extending it for extension's sake.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----------Original Message-----------
>
>
> Jamie McKendrick wrote:
>
> Not really a complaint. You have stuck to and done little more than restate your initial position, as you're entitled to, and have kept asking for me to justify my position, which I have done with more and more detail. Look back over the thread.
> This last laconic post of yours is a perfect example. You just request more detail and justification from me while offering nothing yourself.
> Anyway I see no point in arguing about this.
> Jamie
|