Not really a complaint. You have stuck to and done little more than restate your initial position, as you're entitled to, and have kept asking for me to justify my position, which I have done with more and more detail. Look back over the thread.
This last laconic post of yours is a perfect example. You just request more detail and justification from me while offering nothing yourself.
Anyway I see no point in arguing about this.
Jamie
> On 24 Oct 2016, at 12:58, David Lace <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> I don't think this is justified Jamie. Please elaborate.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----------Original Message-----------
>
>
> Jamie McKendrick wrote:
>
> I’ve been doing a fair bit of work here and David – no (or not much of a) criticism intended – has just repeated his initial point over and over, and required explanations. Each one of which is met with the same initial response.
|