Interesting that during the primaries she was criticized as a neoliberal. Since then I guess she's become a neocon. The prefix seems to be operative--a universal negative among neoprogressives.
-----Original Message-----
>From: David Lace <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Oct 19, 2016 11:04 AM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Why Shakespeare Matters debate
>
>Great to be optimistic Mark, but see:
>
>http://hillaryisaneocon.com/
>
>and:
>
>"Jill Stein: Trump Is Less Dangerous Than Clinton; She Will Start Nuclear War With Russia"
>
>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/10/12/jill_stein_hillary_clintons_declared_syria_policy_could_start_a_nuclear_war.html
>
>"HILLARY’S WARS (Pt. 1): Clinton Reset Button with Russia Goes Nuclear"
>
>http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-09/hillary%E2%80%99s-wars-pt-1-clinton-reset-button-russia-goes-nuclear
>
>"Robert Kagan and Other Neocons Are Backing Hillary Clinton"
>
>http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-09/hillary%E2%80%99s-wars-pt-1-clinton-reset-button-russia-goes-nuclear
>
>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------Original Message------------------
>
>Mark Weiss wrote:
>
>Her widely announced [policies should make neocons wither. There may well be confrontations with Russia, but it takes two. What rubbish.
|