Well, maybe David, but this cafuffle has really aroused a lot of anger and miles of threads on facebook. It's quite a weird one really. Everything about it, from the original 'offence' to the OTT defence of it by Croft is strange.
On 8 Sep 2016, at 12:23, David Lace wrote:
> Being a bit of a devil’s advocate here, but if I wrote poetry and a poem I wrote was plagiarised, it probably wouldn’t bother me all that much. I would just make sure that I could prove I wrote the poem first, and let the plagiariser look like a fool. And if I were a famous poet, everyone would know anyway that I wrote the poem. So I don’t know what all the fuss is about. It’s not like there are any royalties in poetry etc.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------Original Message-------------------
>
> Tim Allen wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for putting these out Jeffrey - interesting. I must say that Andy Croft really seems to have dug a hole for himself in this debate with Lightman - what Croft says is completely disingenuous, which is a great shame - I used to respect him a lot and he is one of the few genuine UK socialist poets, but with this issue he really seems to have become a bit of a defensive crank. I don't get it. Most of the poetry he's defending is pretty rubbish anyway.
>
> Tim A.
|