Recently, and following much appreciated input, I used the below call
in FLIRT to calculate a Talairach to MNI transform; the initial step
in transferring a thalamic nucleus mask created in Talairach space to
MNI space
flirt -ref $FSLDIR/data/standard/MNI152_T1_1mm_brain -in
colin_tlrc_1x1x1.nii.gz -out higresTal_T12standard -omat
higresTal_T12standard.mat
However, my attempts to apply the transform matrix to the Talairach
mask have resulted in inaccurate results; the coordinate results
differ too widely from known coordinates from Talairach coordinates
either converted to MNI coordinates with tal2icbm_fsl or to Talairach
label coordinates in fslview MNI space.
I have tried to follow directions outlined on the FLIRT FAQ
http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/FLIRT/FAQ#How_do_I_transform_a_mask_with_FLIRT_from_one_space_to_another.3F
but must be making some errors.
Any recommendations on how to apply the transform to the Talairach
space mask would be much appreciated.
Best,
Charles
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Charles Leger <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Thank you Colin. This is very helpful...
>
> Best,
> Charles
>
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Charles <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> FSL experts,
>>
>> Recently I posted a question asking how to transform a mask created in Talairach space to MNI space - all data in a current project will ultimately be in MNI space for initial analysis in FSL. Taliairach coordinates can be converted to MNI space and subsequently a sphere mask can be made in FSL but it would be preferable to convert to MNI space an actual Talairach space mask made for the structure in question (a thalamic nucleus); the thalamic nucleus in question is not currently available in MNI space.
>>
>> While the FLIRT (FNIRT) FAQ instructions (http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/FLIRT/FAQ#How_do_I_transform_a_mask_with_FLIRT_from_one_space_to_another.3F ) work flawlessly for transforming masks between spaces, converting a mask from a different standard (Talairach) appears to involve more steps (FNIRT).
>>
>> Again, any suggestions would be much appreciated.
>>
>> Best,
>> Charles
|