Dear Colleagues,
We are organizing a panel at the CASA 2016 conference in Prague, Czech Republic. Theme is Ambiguity and our panel is called "Ambiquity and Dilemma of Uniformity in Migration"
The deadline for paper proposals is the 20th August 2016, proposals should be sent to [log in to unmask]; conference is 30th September - 1st October 2016 in Prague. Please visit:http://www.casaonline.cz
Ambiguity and Dilemma of Uniformity in Migration
Nothing is more ambiguous then migration. One can even argue that ambiguity is a prerequisite for migration. Migrant is a human being whose identity is changing all the time according to the context of migrant’s life, migrant is on the move, migrant may evoke various associations, migrant decides and acts flexibly when some internalized patterns become useless, reality becomes ambiguous when people of different background and origin start to live together. However, ambiguity itself is not acceptable for categorizers, it is necessary to be unambiguous, classifiable or definable. Dilemma of ambiguity versus uniformity is associated with migration flows and post-migration processes. Sometimes, agents (individuals, groups, organizations) have to give up their constitutive ambiguity. Indeed, ambiguity is constitutive in many respects but migrants face the necessity to become uniform. The disappearance of ambiguity could happen in two ways: by choice or negotiation with shared uniformity – which depends on values, ideas, rules of action etc., or by re-definition of ambiguity as uniformity. The reality of transnational identities, hybridization or creolization of cultures depends on the negotiation of ambiguity as unambiguous standpoints of live. In this view, ambiguity may be seen as an advantage. It enables humans to belong to multiple groups and generates social, cultural or existential profit from membership. This profit could be also mediated. Nevertheless, the way to negotiate ambiguity is not fully straightforward; it impinges on existence of institutions focused on shared uniformity in the form of belonging, e.g. state or church, which assert reproduction of shared unambiguity. Migrants also impinge on the idea of unambiguity required by some groups. On the one hand, we would like to talk about transnational migration, hybridization and creolization of cultures and, on the other hand, about the necessity to classify into institutionally or nationally shared uniformity. We are interested in migrant strategies to negotiate their own ambiguity. We are interested in benefits from this ambiguity as well as challenges raised by these benefits. Also, we would like to speak about the roles of institutions founded on uniformity. Since ambiguity is dangerous for these institutions, they are trying to negotiate unambiguity in the ambiguous world of migration. In addition, we are interested in specific national groups and their feeling (and acting) to have the right to demand unambiguity.
(http://www.casaonline.cz/?page_id=1453)
Please, don´t hesitate to submit and to contact us,
With Best wishes,
Ludek Jirka, Dana Bittnerova
Faculty of Humanities, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic
*************************************************************
* Anthropology-Matters Mailing List
* http://www.anthropologymatters.com *
* A postgraduate project comprising online journal, *
* online discussions, teaching and research resources *
* and international contacts directory. *
* To join this list or to look at the archived previous *
* messages visit: *
* http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/Anthropology-Matters.HTML *
* If you have ALREADY subscribed: to send a message to all *
* those currently subscribed to the list,just send mail to: *
* [log in to unmask] *
* *
* Enjoyed the mailing list? Why not join the new *
* CONTACTS SECTION @ www.anthropologymatters.com *
* an international directory of anthropology researchers
*
* To unsubscribe: please log on to jiscmail.ac.uk, and *
* go to the 'Subscriber's corner' page. *
*
***************************************************************
|