Dear jinan k b,
Looks like you have a different view and attitude about what is involved in memorization than you have taken the time to convey. If you mean that conscious memorizatIon is that nasty stuff of deliberately being able to repeat what you hear i.e. Rote learning, I can agree with you. The use of the word conscious implies consciousness so please go deeper than you seem to be going. There is no problem with the issue of multi sensory experience as an informant of conscious thought. However, it is not dependent on it. Conscious thought can also arise from the processing of memories established by other means such inspiration, intuition and insight. Your statement that " the organic nature of learning makes us remember in a manner that would allow recollection at the right moment" is a statement of belief not fact. You need to explain how that recollection occurs and how it is enabled.
Or, so I believe.
Chuck
> On Jul 16, 2016, at 12:48, Jinan K B <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Dear Charles
>
> Looks like you havn't paid full attention to what i wrote. let me
> reproduce it below. I did not use the word 'consciousness' at all but
> just 'conscious'.
>
> "Conscious memorization of information devoid of experiential reference
> disturbs the organic recollection and the process of organic
> memorization. In natural and organic process of memorization the input
> is usually multi sensory and there is an integral connection to
> experience. The text as well as the class room totally disrupts this
> organic and integral connection with life.
>
> In natural process conscious memorization has no role. The organic
> nature of learning makes us remember in a manner that would allow
> recollection at the apt moment.
> So what gets stored is primarily what has been SEEN. Visual thinking
> is the natural process of non literate people except that it will not
> be called 'thinking'."
>
>
>
>> On 16/07/2016, CHARLES BURNETTE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Dear Colleagues,
>> I would like to contest jinan's remark that consciousness has no role in
>> memorization. Without consciousness there would be no memorization.
>> Neuroscientist Stanislas Dehaene and his colleagues have established that
>> consciousness is in fact the very basis of memorization. It is how thought
>> uses the resources of language and communication that the mind affords and
>> how thoughts become formalized and durable.
>>
>> Or, so I believe,
>> Chuck
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>> PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
>> Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
>> Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>
>
> --
> Jinan,
> 'DIGITAL MEDIUM IS A TOOL.DIGITALLY MEDIATED KNOWLEDGE DESTROYS THE BEING'
>
> http://sadhanavillageschool.org/
> https://www.youtube.com/user/sadhanavillagepune
> https://www.youtube.com/user/jinansvideos
> www.re-cognition.org
> www.kumbham.org
> reimaginingschools.wordpress.com
> http://designeducationasia.blogspot.com/
> http://awakeningaestheticawareness.wordpress.com/
> https://independent.academia.edu/JinanKodapully
> 09447121544
> 0487 2386723
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
> Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
> Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|