Hi Anderson,
Thanks! I'd also like to account in some way for between-run variance as FLAME does, even if there are only two runs per condition in some cases. Would you suggest just adding a covariate at this level for that?
Thanks!
On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 09:40:18 +0100, Anderson M. Winkler <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>For the second level, it's possible to compare (subtract) or average less
>than 3 COPEs by choosing "Fixed effects" in the "Data" tab. You would then
>run a 3rd level for inference across all subjects.
>
>All the best,
>
>Anderson
>
>
>On 8 July 2016 at 17:27, Nikki <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Thank you! That makes sense. However, now I have a second-level analysis
>> with only two runs in some cases - e.g. where EV1 only occurs in runs 1 and
>> 2. Feat appears that it requires 3 cope images to complete a higher-level
>> analysis. It errors if I try to leave the third blank, and won't let me
>> specify the number of inputs as less than three. Is that accurate? Any
>> suggestions on how to handle this? Or is this not possible through the GUI?
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>
|