Hi David,
Thank you very much for all of your insight.
Kind regards,
Isaac
On 1/07/2016, 12:24 AM, "FSL - FMRIB's Software Library on behalf of David V. Smith" <[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Hi Isaac,
>
>Unless you're talking about a different question or set of findings, it's not clear to me that the approach employed by Leech would help you understand what's happening with VLPFC. Most reviewers won't have a problem with the fact that your VLPFC is not within the suprathreshold parts of DMN, assuming it fits in with your hypothesis or some theoretical framework.
>
>Cheers,
>David
>
>
>> On Jun 29, 2016, at 11:30 PM, SUBSCRIBE FSL Isaac Unger <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Firstly, thank you very much for those references. They are excellent!
>>
>> It is correct that my region “X” is not part of my network “Y”; the output of my dual regression is showing altered connectivity between a VLPFC region and the IC mapping the DMN.
>>
>> To run a seed/ROI approach as you have suggested, would you recommend a similar protocol to that used by Leech et al. (2012)?
>>
>> Thanks again,
>> Isaac
|