Dear CCP4BB
Does anyone know why we don't quote standard uncertainties on unit cell constants in the way that the small molecule community do? It would seem in the new world of multi-crystal data sets and serial crystallography some idea of the measure of ignorance would be particularly valuable.
I'm not worried about whether they are "right" or "true" just interested in why we don't quote them...
An example for thaumatin may look like this, for example:
Unit cell (with estimated std devs):
57.7841(1) 57.7841(1) 149.9963(3)
90.0000(0) 90.0000(0) 90.0000(0)
(in other news, there is no place to store this information in an MTZ file...)
Thanks & best wishes Graeme
--
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail.
Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd.
Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message.
Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom
|