Hi
I'm part of a group of about 10 members developing evidence-based clinical summaries on various topics. Currently we have no systematic means of resolving disagreements that occasionally arise about interpretation of research evidence. I wonder whether anyone might be able to offer advice on the most appropriate method? One option might be to seek the opinion of an independent expert; another might be to conduct a brief Delphi process to reach a consensus. The latter would have the advantage of anonymity. Any suggestions?
Kevin Galbraith
|