Hi Mary,
We analyse (manually) all RCUK papers as they are added to our repository and monthly, we generate a report in order to keep track of trends. We use the following categories:
- paper has datasets available and data access statement
- paper has datasets available but no data access statement
We do not consider the traditional pdf SI as datasets.
With regards to making a distinction between theoretical and experimental papers we do it when it is obvious, but in most cases it is difficult to determine.
Best wishes,
Federica
Dr Federica Fina
Data Scientist (Research Data Management)
University of St Andrews Library
North Street, St Andrews, KY16 9TR
-----Original Message-----
From: Research Data Management discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mary Donaldson
Sent: 15 June 2016 15:43
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: EPSRC Year 1 benchmarking
Hello list,
I've just finished analysing all our EPSRC-funded papers published between 01 May 2015 and 30 Apr 2016 for data citations or similar statements about data availability.
I used the following broad categories:
Data citation present (to data in a repository - most were our own or other institutional repositories, but some were CCDC or Github etc) No data citation but SI available.
No data citation (theoretical paper)
No data citation (experimental paper)
I was wondering if anyone else had done a similar analysis and would like to compare results?
Best wishes,
Mary
Mary Donaldson
RDM Service Coordinator
University of Glasgow
|