Looking at the art samples helps here, Doug. Otherwise I would have been
more in the Pat camp than the Max one. I suspect the 'subtle no' is the
heart of this poem but still I don't know.
Bill
On Thursday, 14 April 2016, Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> the lightest lines
> against a light
> er background
>
> error backs down
> that row upon row
> such a subtle no
>
> does that mesh protect
> against or just
> the real soon lost
>
> in the intricate maze
> disintegrating
> sly as sky writ
>
> Douglas Barbour
> [log in to unmask] <javascript:;>
> https://eclecticruckus.wordpress.com/
>
> Recent publications: (With Sheila E Murphy) Continuations & Continuations
> 2 (UofAPress).
> Recording Dates (Rubicon Press).
>
> Transforming once reasonable human beings into gullible idiots is one of
> the biggest businesses we have.
>
> Charles Simic.
>
|